Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Madan Ganpat Bhoi vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 1546 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1546 Bom
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2022

Bombay High Court
Madan Ganpat Bhoi vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 15 February, 2022
Bench: Prakash Deu Naik
                      rpa                             1/2          14 apeal 1050 2019.doc


                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                      CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1050 OF 2019


                      Madan Ganpat Bhoi                                  .. Appellant
                            Versus
                      State of Maharashtra and Ors.                      .. Respondents

                                                       ......
                      Mr.Suhas M. Oak i/b. Mr.Sagar A. Joshi, Advocate for the Appellant.
                      Mr.S.V. Gavand, APP for the Respondent No.1-State.
                      Mr.S.A. Shaikh, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5.
                                                       ......

                                                      CORAM :    PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

                                                      DATED :    FEBRUARY 15, 2022.

                      P.C. :

                                   The appellant is the original complainant in C.R.No.I-244

                      of 2014, registered with Nijampura police station, Bhiwandi, District-

                      Thane. The offences were registered against respondent nos. 2 to 5

                      under Sections 324, 504 and 506 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code

                      ("IPC", for short). Respondent nos.2 to 5 were acquitted vide judgment

                      and order dated 30th May, 2019.


         Digitally
         signed by
         RAJESHRI
RAJESHRI PRAKASH
PRAKASH AHER
                      2            The appellant/complainant is aggrieved by the judgment
AHER     Date:
         2022.02.17
         16:20:28
         +0530        and order of acquittal, and, hence, preferred this Appeal under

                      Section 372 of Cr.P.C.
 rpa                             2/2             14 apeal 1050 2019.doc


3             Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the

appellant and others were convicted in a cross case arising out of

same incident vide judgment and order dated 31st May, 2019, passed

by D.J.1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No.63

of 2017, for the offences punishable under Sections 325 and 504 of

IPC. The appellant herein and the other accused in the said

proceedings have preferred criminal Appeal No.884 of 2019, which

has been admitted by this Court, and pending for fnal disposal.


4             Considering the fact that there were cross cases and

Appeal preferred by the appellant herein is admitted by this Court,

this Appeal arising out of cross case is required to be admitted and

heard along-with Criminal Appeal No.884 of 2019.


5             Hence, I pass the following order:


                              :: O R D E R ::

(i) Admit;

(ii) Call for record and proceedings;

(iii) To be heard along-with Criminal Appeal No.884 of

2019.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter