Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gandhi Securities And Investment ... vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 1403 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1403 Bom
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2022

Bombay High Court
Gandhi Securities And Investment ... vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income ... on 9 February, 2022
Bench: K.R. Sriram, N. J. Jamadar
          Digitally
          signed by
          GAURI AMIT                                   1/3                       903.WP-476-2022.doc
GAURI     GAEKWAD
AMIT      Date:
GAEKWAD   2022.02.10
          10:46:26
          +0530               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                           WRIT PETITION NO.476 OF 2022

             Gandhi Securities and Investment Pvt. Ltd.           ....Petitioner
                       V/s.
             Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
             Circle 4(1)(1) and Ors.                         ....Respondents
                                                 ----
             Mr. Gopal Mundhra a/w. Mr. Parth Parikh i/b. Economic Laws Practice for
             petitioner.
             Mr. Sham V. Walve i/b. Mr. Suresh Kumar for respondents.
                                                 ----
                                                    CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &
                                                             N.J. JAMADAR, JJ.

DATED : 9th FEBRUARY 2022

P.C. :

1 Petitioner is impugning a notice dated 31 st March 2021 issued

under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the said Act). The reasons

for reopening alongwith the notice is annexed to the petition.

2 Mr. Mundhra submits that the reason for reopening is identical

to a query raised by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer vide a

communication dated 4th September 2017 to which petitioner had filed a

response through its Chartered Accountants' letter dated 19 th September

2017. Mr. Mundhra states that subsequently an assessment order has been

passed without making any addition. Therefore, once the query has been

raised on the issue and answered by the assessee, even if that is not

discussed in the assessment order, still as held by this Court in Aroni

Commercials Ltd. V/s. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 2 (1) 1, the

1. (2014) 44 taxmann.com 304 (Bombay)

Gauri Gaekwad 2/3 903.WP-476-2022.doc

Assessing Officer is supposed to have applied his mind to the issue.

Mr. Mundhra states that relying on the same set of documents, notice

cannot be issued to take a different view. Mr. Mundhra states that the

reasons for reopening clearly indicate change of opinion which is not

permissible in law.

3 Mr. Walve states that petitioner has rushed to the Court without

even filing its objections to the notice issued under Section 148 of the said

Act and if petitioner files its objections to the notice, the Assessing Officer

will consider those objections and take a decision in accordance with law. It

is premature on the part of petitioner to have approached this Court.

Mr. Walve states that the Court should, therefore, dismiss the petition and

direct petitioner to make all submissions before the concerned Assessing

Officer by filing its objections.

4 Therefore, the petition is disposed with the following

directions :

(a) petitioner shall within two weeks from today file its objections to the notice dated 31 st March 2021 under Section 148 of the said Act for Assessment Year 2015-2016;

(b) the Assessing Officer shall consider the objections, give a personal hearing to petitioner and the notice of personal hearing shall be communicated to petitioner within one week in advance and pass a detailed order dealing with the objections raised by petitioner within six weeks from the date of this order getting uploaded;

(c) if the Assessing Officer wishes to rely on any judgments or order passed by any Court or

Gauri Gaekwad 3/3 903.WP-476-2022.doc

Tribunal, he shall provide a copy thereof to petitioner and give them an opportunity to deal with those judgments or distinguish those judgments and those submissions of petitioner shall also be dealt with in the assessment order.

5 We clarify that we have not made any observation on the merits

of the case.

(N.J. JAMADAR, J.)                                           (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)




Gauri Gaekwad
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter