Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hindustan Oil Exploration ... vs Ultra Deep Subsea Pte Ltd. And Anr
2022 Latest Caselaw 1358 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1358 Bom
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2022

Bombay High Court
Hindustan Oil Exploration ... vs Ultra Deep Subsea Pte Ltd. And Anr on 8 February, 2022
Bench: S.J. Kathawalla, Milind N. Jadhav
                   KANCHAN    Digitally signed by
                              KANCHAN
                   PRASHANT   PRASHANT DHURI
                              Date: 2022.02.08
                   DHURI      19:41:52 +0530

Kanchan P Dhuri                                     1    / 4                       26-COMAPL-30641-2021.odt


                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                          COMMERCIAL APPEAL (L) NO. 30641 OF 2021
                                                               IN
              COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 22272 OF 2021
    Hindustan Oil Exploration Company Limited                              ...     Appellant
              Versus
    Ultra Deep Subsea Pte. Ltd. and another                                ...     Respondents
                                                           WITH
                         INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 30648 OF 2021
                                                               IN
                          COMMERCIAL APPEAL (L) NO. 30641 OF 2021
                                                           .........
    Mr. Sunil Mathews alongwith Mr. Sumit Raghani instructed by Agrud Partners for the
    Appellant.
    Mr. Zarir Bharucha alongwith Bimal Rajasekhar and Chandrashekhar Haridh and Mr.
    Rohan Pajnigar instructed by ZBA Advocates and Solicitors for Respondent No.1.
                                         .........
                                                        CORAM :      S.J. KATHAWALLA AND
                                                                     MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
                                                        DATED :      FEBRUARY 8, 2022.
                                                                     (through video-conferencing)

    P.C. :-

1. Heard the Learned Advocates appearing for the Appellant and

Respondent No.1. The reliefs sought against Respondent No.2 are not pressed.

2. The Court is informed today that the Appellant (Respondent No.1

before the Learned Single Judge) and Respondent No.1 (Petitioner before the Learned Kanchan P Dhuri 2 / 4 26-COMAPL-30641-2021.odt

Single Judge) have agreed to settle their dispute.

3. The dispute between the Parties has arisen out of a Time Charter Party

dated 25th January 2021 for time charter hire of the Respondent No.1's Diving Support

Vessel Lichtenstein by the Appellant. Respondent No.1 claimed that the Appellant

defaulted in payment of an admitted liability of USD 6,212,831.67 (United States

Dollars Six Million Two Hundred and Twelve Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty

One Dollars and Sixty Seven Cents Only) against various Invoices raised by the

Respondent No. 1 under the Time Charter Party, which according to it had not been

disputed. Respondent No.1's case was vehemently opposed by the Appellant on

various grounds. After hearing the Parties, the Learned Single Judge vide impugned

Judgment and order dated 13th December 2021, inter-alia directed the Appellant to

deposit a sum of USD 6,212,831.67, under Section 9 of the Arbitration and

Conciliation Act, 1996.

4. Against a total amount of USD 6,212,831.67 (United States Dollars Six

Million Two Hundred and Twelve Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty One Dollars

and Sixty Seven Cents Only), which the Learned Single Judge vide impugned order

and Judgment of 13th December 2021 ordered to be deposited, the Appellant agrees

and undertakes to pay to Respondent No.1, a sum of USD 5,200,000.00 (United

States Dollars Five Million and Two Hundred Thousand Only) as full and final

settlement against the claims of both the Parties arising out of the Time Charter Party Kanchan P Dhuri 3 / 4 26-COMAPL-30641-2021.odt

dated 25th January 2021, subject to compliance by the Appellant of the following terms

and conditions.

5. The Appellant agrees and undertakes to this Court to pay Respondent

No.1 the amount of USD 5,200,000.00 (United States Dollars Five Million and Two

Hundred Thousand Only), in four equal installments in accordance with the payment

schedule specified below-

(i) An amount of USD 1,400,000.00 (United States Dollars One Million

Four Hundred Thousand Only) on/before 8th February 2022;

(ii) An amount of USD 333,334.00 (United States Dollars Three Hundred

and Thirty Three Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Four Only) on or before 17th

February 2022;

(iii) An amount of USD 1,733,333.00 (United States Dollars One Million

Seven Hundred and Thirty Three Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Three Only)

on or before 31 March 2022; and

(iv) An amount of USD 1,733,333.00 (United States Dollars One Million

Seven Hundred and Thirty Three Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Three Only)

on or before 31st May 2022.

6. In the event that the Appellant fails to make full and timely payment in

accordance with the payment schedule, set out in Paragraph 4 above, the aggregate

amount of USD 6,212,831.67 (less the amounts already paid, if any by the Appellant to Kanchan P Dhuri 4 / 4 26-COMAPL-30641-2021.odt

Respondent No.1 under the terms of this Order), shall forthwith become due and

payable by the Appellant to Respondent No.1, whereupon this order shall operate as a

final judgment and decree of this Court in favour of Respondent No.1 and against the

Appellant for the said amount of USD 6,212,831.67, less the amounts already paid (if

any) under this Order and interest thereon at 5% p.a. till payment/ realization, entitling

Respondent No 1 to execute this Order as a final Judgment and decree against the

Appellant. Respondent No.1 shall be at liberty to apply for clarifications, if required.

7. Respondent No.1 shall be entitled to avail of all its rights and remedies in

accordance with law, in the event of the Appellant's default in payment as set out in

paragraph 4 above.

8. This Appeal is accordingly disposed off in accordance with the

aforementioned terms. The above Interim Application also disposed off as

infructuous.

    ( MILIND N. JADHAV, J. )                                 ( S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. )
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter