Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1348 Bom
Judgement Date : 8 February, 2022
(7)-AO-381-2017 with CAA-488-2017.doc
08.02.2022
Digitally signed
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
by
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMMAD NAJEEB
NAJEEB MOHAMMAD
MOHAMMAD QAYYUM
QAYYUM Date:
2022.02.08
18:03:50
+0530
Appeal from Order No. 381 / 2017
Alongwith
Civil Application (CAA) No. 488 / 2017
in
Appeal from Order No. 381 / 2017
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai ... Appellant
Versus
Mr. Anis Mahemood Ansari ... Respondent
****
Mr. Ravindra Sirsikar, Advocate for the Appellant/MCGM.
None for the Respondent.
****
CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.
DATE : 8th FEBRUARY, 2022.
[Through Video Conference]
P.C.
Heard. Mr. Sirsikar, learned Counsel for the Corporation. None
for the Respondent.
1. The learned trial Court relying on the judgment in the case of
Goverdhan Vs. MCGM has held that if a person has raised any
unauthorized construction before issuing notice under Section 354A of
Najeeb 1/2 (7)-AO-381-2017 with CAA-488-2017.doc 08.02.2022
the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act (MMC), the remedy available
to the Corporation is one, under Section 351 and not under Section
354A of MMC Act. In Paragraph No. 8 of the impugned order, the
learned trial Court has granted liberty to the Corporation for invoking
appropriate provisions in relation to the suit construction. Mr.
Sirsikar, learned Counsel for the Corporation seeks time to verify the
factual position. Time granted.
2. Stand over to 28th February, 2022.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.)
Najeeb 2/2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!