Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13476 Bom
Judgement Date : 22 December, 2022
16-crwp6313-2019.doc
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6313 OF 2019
Yogendra Dayabhai Patel & Ors. ... Petitioners
Digitally
signed by
ATUL
V/s.
The State of Maharasthra & Anr. ... Respondents
ATUL GANESH
GANESH KULKARNI
KULKARNI Date:
2022.12.22
17:21:28
+0530
Mr. Bhomesh Bellam and Mr. Chintan Y. Shah for the
petitioners.
Mr. A.R. Patil, APP for respondent no.1/State.
Ms. Anita M. Bafna for respondent no.2.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : DECEMBER 22, 2022
P.C.:
1. The petitioners are challenging order of issuance of process and confirmation thereof by the revisional Court. According to the petitioners, they are additional non-executive directions of accused no.1/company. In support of the said contention, the petitioners have produced Form DIR-12 issued pursuant to sections 7(1)(c), 168 and 113(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. On perusal of the said form, it appears that the petitioners are additional non- executive directors.
2. In view of the judgment of the Apex Court in Sunita Palita & Ors. v. Panchami Stone Qyarry reported in 2022 SCC OnLine 945 and the judgment in Poona Ravinder Devdasani
16-crwp6313-2019.doc
v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. reported in 2014 (16) SCC 1, the petitioners have made arguable points. Hence, Rule.
3. There shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) qua the petitioners only till the final disposal of this writ petition.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!