Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13186 Bom
Judgement Date : 19 December, 2022
:1: 6-i.ia-4333-22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4333 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1241 OF 2022
Shashikant @ Sachin Deepak Bagul ..... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents
-----
Mr. Nikhil G. Hire, Advocate for the Appellant.
Ms. M.R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE : 19th DECEMBER, 2022
P.C. :
1. This is an application for bail pending final
Digitally signed
disposal of the applicant's appeal challenging the judgment
by
PRADIPKUMAR
PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO
PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE
and order dated 14.11.2022 passed by the Additional
DESHMANE Date:
2022.12.21
10:51:01
+0530
Sessions Judge, Malegaon in Sessions Case No.124/2015.
The applicant was convicted for commission of the offences
punishable under Section 354-D(i) of IPC and under Section
12 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act,
2012 (for short, 'POCSO Act'). The maximum sentence
imposed on him was for three months besides imposition of
1 of 3
Deshmane(PS)
:2: 6-i.ia-4333-22.odt
fine.
2. Heard Shri Nikhil Hire, learned counsel for the
appellant and Smt. M.R. Tidke, learned APP for the
Respondent No.1-State.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that
the applicant was arrested merely on the basis of suspicion.
The applicant had not tried to contact the victim. Therefore,
the ingredients of Section 354-D(i) of IPC are not made out.
He submitted that the birth certificate of the victim is not
proved as the person issuing the birth-certificate had no
authority. Therefore, the conviction under the POCSO Act is
not sustainable.
4. He further submitted that the applicant was on
bail and has not misused that liberty. Even after conviction,
he was granted bail for a temporary period under Section
389 of Cr.P.C..
5. Learned APP opposed this application, but, she
conceded that the sentence is short.
6. Considering these submissions, the points raised
2 of 3
:3: 6-i.ia-4333-22.odt
by learned counsel for the applicant can be decided at the
final hearing stage of his appeal. The sentence is short. The
appeal is not likely to be decided within that period.
Therefore, he can be granted bail during pendency of his
appeal.
7. Hence, the following order :
:: O R D E R ::
i. During pendency and final disposal of Criminal
Appeal No.1241/2022, the applicant is directed to
be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. bond in
the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand
Only) with one or two sureties in the like amount.
ii. The applicant shall not harass the victim directly or
indirectly.
iii. Interim Application is disposed of accordingly.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Deshmane (PS)
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!