Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri. Datta Mandir Deosthan ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Through ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 12865 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12865 Bom
Judgement Date : 12 December, 2022

Bombay High Court
Shri. Datta Mandir Deosthan ... vs The State Of Maharashtra Through ... on 12 December, 2022
Bench: Avinash G. Gharote
                            1            334.FA.509-2015 JUDGMENT.odt




    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
              NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

              FIRST APPEAL NO. 509 OF 2015

1. Shri Datta Mandir Deosthan, through
   Shobha Wd/o Dyaneshwar Lokhande,
   Aged about 55 years,
   Occ. Agriculturist,

2. Pravin S/o Dyaneshwar Lokhande,
   Aged about 33 years,
   Occ. Agriculturist,

3. Pramod S/o Dyaneshwar Lokhande,
   Aged about 30 years,
   Occ. Agriculturist,

4. Harihar S/o Dyaneshwar Lokhande,
   Aged about 28 years,
   Occ. Agriculturist,
   All R/o Kotha (Fattepur),
   Tq. Babhulgaon, Dist. Yavatmal.
                                          APPELLANTS

     Versus

1. The State of Maharashtra,
   Through the Collector, Yavatmal.

2. Executive Engineer,
   Bembala Project Division,
   Tq & Dist. Yavatmal.

3. Special Land Acquisition Officer,
   Benefited Zone, Yavatmal.             RESPONDENTS
                                   2                 334.FA.509-2015 JUDGMENT.odt




-----------------------------------------------
Mr. S.V. Ingole, Advocate for the Appellants.
Ms. M.H. Deshmukh, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 3.
Mr. M.A. Kadu, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
-----------------------------------------------

                      CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.
                      DATED      : 12th DECEMBER, 2022.

ORAL JUDGMENT :-


              Heard     Mr.   Ingole,    learned      Counsel          for         the

appellants,      Ms. Deshmukh, learned AGP for the respondent

Nos.1 and 3/State and Mr. Kadu, learned Counsel for the

respondent No.2.

2. The factual position in the present appeal is as

under -

BEMBLA PROJECT DIVISION, DISTRICT YAVATMAL

DATE OF NOTIFICATION U/S 4 OF THE LAC ACT 24.07.2003

Property details Area of property LAO Award Ref. Court Dated Award Dated 27.06.2005 11.04.2014

Village:Barad Gat No. 47 Rs.81,540/- per Rs.1,75,000/-

 Tahsil             Admeasuring           hectare             per hectare
 Babhulgaon,        2.35 HR dry
 District           crop land.
 Yavatmal.
                              3               334.FA.509-2015 JUDGMENT.odt




3.         The   appeal   challenges   the   judgment             of        the

Reference Court dated 11.04.2014, whereby the learned

Reference Court has enhanced the compensation for the land of

Gat No. 47 to Rs. 1,75,000/- per hectare.

4. In Ashok s/o Uttamchand Kotecha (since dead),

Through LRs Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors., First Appeal

No. 399/2011 with connected matter decided on 07.03.2019

(Shri A.S. Chandurkar, J.), by considering the sale instance

considered in First Appeal No. 1062/2014 (Bhaskar s/o

Sadashiv Pardakhe Vs. The Executive Engineer and ors.), the

rate for agricultural land at Village Barad, acquired under the

same notification has been fixed at Rs. 2,10,000/- per hectare.

Mr. Kadu, learned counsel for the respondent No.2, does not

dispute this proposition and upon instructions makes a

statement that the rate of Rs. 2,10,000/- per hectare for dry

crop land at Village Barad has been accepted by the respondent

No.2, considering which, there is no reason why the aforesaid

rate could not be made applicable to the present land, which is

from the same notification and for the same purpose,

considering which, the award of the learned Reference Court

needs modification by enhancing the rate of compensation as 4 334.FA.509-2015 JUDGMENT.odt

indicated above.

5. The appeal is accordingly partly allowed by

enhancing the rate of compensation for dry crop agricultural

land of Gat No. 47 admeasuring 2.35 HR to Rs. 2,10,000/- per

hectare, in view of what has been held in Ashok s/o

Uttamchand Kotecha (Supra).

6. The appropriate calculations be made and the

enhanced compensation be deposited in this Court within a

period of six weeks. While calculating the compensation due

note shall be taken of order dated 07.04.2015 regarding the

condonation of delay for which duration the claimants shall not

be entitled upon the amount of compensation. Difference in the

Court fees upon the enhanced compensation, if any, shall be

paid within one week, from the date the calculations are placed

on record.

7. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of

accordingly.

( AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) Signed By:SHRIKANT DAMODHAR BHIMTE

S.D.Bhimte Signing Date:14.12.2022 17:42

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter