Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dnyandeo S/O Haribhau Katkar And ... vs State Of Maharashtra Through ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 8051 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8051 Bom
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2022

Bombay High Court
Dnyandeo S/O Haribhau Katkar And ... vs State Of Maharashtra Through ... on 19 August, 2022
Bench: A.S. Chandurkar, Urmila Sachin Phalke
4-J-WP-2463-20                                                           1/3


          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

                    WRIT PETITION NO.2463 OF 2020


1. Dnyandeo s/o Haribhau Katkar,
   aged 59 years, Occupation Agriculturist
   and Business, R/o Ekta Nagar
   Tq. And District Buldana

2. Tikamchand Bhagwandas Wadhavani,
   Aged about 56 years, Occupation Business,
   R/o Wankhede Layout, Buldana,
   Tq. And District Buldana

3. Bhajanlal Sundarlal Begwani,
   Aged about 65 years, Occupation Business,
   R/o Wankhede Lay-out, Buldana,
   Tq. And District Buldana                              ... Petitioners

-vs-

1. State of Maharashtra,
   Through Secretary, Urban Development,
   Mantralaya, Fort, Mumbai 44032.

2. Municipal Council, Buldana,
   Through its Chief Officer, Buldana,
   R/o Tq and District Buldana

3. Collector Buldana - Collectorate Office
   Civil Lines, Buldana                                  ... Respondents


Shri S. S. Deshpande, Advocate for petitioners.
Ms N. P. Mehta, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 and 3.
Shri Mangesh Bute, Advocate for respondent No.2.

              CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, JJ.

DATE : August 19, 2022

Oral Judgment : (Per :A. S. Chandurkar, J.)

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard the 4-J-WP-2463-20 2/3

learned counsel for the parties.

According to the petitioners the development plan of the

city of Buldana came into force from 01/01/1991. The petitioners are

owners of land Survey No.28/6-7 admeasuring 1H 20R situated at

Mouza-Buldana Taluka and District Buldana. The said land has been

purchased by them vide sale-deed dated 12/04/2012. The said land

was shown to be reserved at Sr.No.4 for garden. After expiry of period

of ten years from issuance of the development plan, on 02/11/2015

the petitioners issued a notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra

Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (for short, the said Act) upon

the Municipal Council calling upon it to purchase the aforesaid land

for garden as per the development plan. Since no steps have been

taken thereafter by the Municipal Council to acquire the said land, the

petitioners have filed the present writ petition seeking a declaration

that the said reservation has lapsed.

2. In the reply filed on behalf of the Municipal Council it has

been stated that on account of its financial condition it was not in a

position to acquire the said land. The receipt of notice under Section

127 of the said Act is not disputed.

3. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after 4-J-WP-2463-20 3/3

perusing the documents on record it is clear that the land in question

was shown to be reserved for garden at Sr.No.4. The issuance of

purchase notice dated 02/11/2015, its receipt and the fact that the

period of twenty four months have elapsed thereafter is not disputed.

On the contrary the Municipal Council has expressed its inability to

acquire the said land. As a result, on expiry of period of twenty four

months from receipt of such notice the deeming effect under Section

127 would expire.

4. Hence for aforesaid reasons it is declared that reservation No.4

for garden in respect of land Survey No.28/6-7 admeasuring 1H 20R

situated at Mouza Buldana Taluka and District Buldana has lapsed

under Section 127 of the said Act. The respondent No.1 shall within

a period of eight weeks from receipt of copy of this judgment issue a

notification indicating reservation No.4 of land Survey No.28/6-7

admeasuring 1H 20R as having lapsed.

The petitioners are free to utilize the aforesaid land in

accordance with the purpose as permissible for the adjoining land.

Rule is made absolute in aforesaid terms with no order as to

costs.

Digitally signed byASMITA (Urmila Joshi-Phalke, J.) (A. S. Chandurkar, J.) ADWAIT BHANDAKKAR Signing Date:22.08.2022 Asmita 16:35:11

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter