Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4168 Bom
Judgement Date : 20 April, 2022
27-ia-1250-2022-revn-162-2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1250 OF 2022
IN
REVISION APPLICATION NO. 162 OF 2022
Digitally
signed by
SHRADDHA
SHRADDHA KAMLESH
KAMLESH TALEKAR
Sanjay Diwakar Todankar ...Applicant
TALEKAR Date:
2022.04.22 Vs.
20:46:25
+0530
1. The State of Maharashtra
& Anr. ... Respondents
****
Mr.Jaydeep A. Shringare for applicant.
Ms.Anamika Malhotra, PP for respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J.
DATE : 20th APRIL, 2022 P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 8 th June
2022.
3. The learned APP waives notice for respondent No.1-State.
4. In addition to the notice through Court, the applicant is at
liberty to serve the respondent No.2 by private service and fle
affdavit of service.
5. The applicant has been convicted by the learned 5 th Joint
Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ratnagiri for the offence
punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,
Shraddha Talekar, PS 1/3 27-ia-1250-2022-revn-162-2022.doc
1881, and sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of
three months and pay compensation of Rs.2,30,000/- along with
the co-accused Sau.Suchita Sanjay Todankar, by judgment and
order, dated 19th December 2017.
6. The applicant-accused carried the matter in appeal being
Criminal Appeal No.10 of 18 before the learned Sessions Judge,
Ratnagiri. By the impugned judgment and order dated 8 th March
2022, the learned Sessions Judge acquitted the co-accused Sau.
Suchita Sanjay Todankar. However, the impugned judgment and
order of conviction and sentence under appeal passed by the
Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ratnagiri, Court No.5 against
applicant-accused No.1 was upheld. Being aggrieved, the
applicant is in revision.
7. Arguable questions are raised. The applicant was on bail
during the pendency of trial as well as appeal. The applicant
appears to have roots in society.
8. Hence, by way of ad-interim order, the substantive sentence
stands suspended and the applicant is directed to be released on
bail on furnishing a P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- and a
surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned
Judicial Magistrate, on the condition that the applicant-accused
Shraddha Talekar, PS 2/3 27-ia-1250-2022-revn-162-2022.doc
No.1 deposits a sum of Rs.1,15,000/- in the Court of learned 5 th
Joint Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ratnagiri, within a period of
four weeks.
9. In the event of default in depositing the said amount, this
order of suspension would stand vacated automatically.
10. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
Shraddha Talekar, PS 3/3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!