Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manoj Kumar Chhikara And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
2021 Latest Caselaw 13688 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 13688 Bom
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2021

Bombay High Court
Manoj Kumar Chhikara And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 22 September, 2021
Bench: S.S. Shinde, N. J. Jamadar
            Digitally signed
LAXMIKANT   by LAXMIKANT
            GOPAL
GOPAL       CHANDAN
CHANDAN     Date: 2021.09.22
            13:54:08 +0530                                                  (7) cri.apl-271.21.odt




                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.271 OF 2021

               Manoj Kumar Chhikara & anr                                     : Applicants.
                     Versus
               State of Maharashtra and anr.                                  : Respondents.

Mr. Abhijeet Sarwate for the Applicants.

Smt. A S Pai, PP, for the Respondent/State.

Mr. Santosh Pohare for Respondent No.2.

                                          CORAM :     S. S. SHINDE,
                                                      N. J. JAMADAR, JJ

                                          DATE    :   22nd September 2021

               P.C.

               1               The matter is on board for speaking to minute of the judgment

               dated 03rd September 2021.



               2               The learned counsel appearing for the Applicants and the

contesting Respondent No.2 submit that there are typographical mistakes in

the judgment dated 03rd September 2021. A detailed praecipe has been filed

mentioning therein the typographical mistakes.

3 In the cause tile of the judgment the age of Applicant/Accused

No.1 be shown as 45 years instead of 25 years, as also the Flat Number of

Applicant/Accused No.1 be shown as Flat No.513 instead of Flat No.613.

               lgc                                                                        1 of 2
                                                         (7) cri.apl-271.21.odt




4           In paragraph 5 on page 4, spelling of the names "Sourabh Sobji",

"Chikkar", and "Rakesh Rajan" be corrected as "Sourabh Sobti" "Chhikara"

and Rakesh Rana" respectively.

5 In paragraph 14 on page 10 the amount "Rs.5000/-" be

substituted by amount "Rs.50,000/-.

6 The judgment dated 03rd September 2021 stands corrected

accordingly. After carrying out necessary corrections, corrected copy of the

judgment be uploaded on the official website.

7 The learned counsel appearing for the Applicants and the

contesting Respondent No.2 submit that the costs amounts mentioned in the

said judgment dated 03rd September 2021 have already been deposited and

receipts are placed on record. Hence the directions as contained in the

judgment dated 03rd September 2021 are complied with.

8 The praecipe for speaking to the minutes of the judgment dated

03rd September 2021 stands disposed of accordingly.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J]                                    [S. S. SHINDE , J]


lgc                                                                        2 of 2
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter