Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shrirang Madhav Zungure Died ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 12333 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12333 Bom
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2021

Bombay High Court
Shrirang Madhav Zungure Died ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 1 September, 2021
Bench: V.K. Jadhav
                                                                   1670.17CA+.odt
                                               1


             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                      934 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1670 OF 2017
                    IN FIRST APPEAL [STAMP] NO.29299 OF 2016

               SHRIRANG MADHAV ZUNGURE DIED THROUGH L.Rs.
                             ARJUN & OTHERS
                                 VERSUS
                   THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
                                       ...
          Mr.D.R.Jayabhar, Advocate for the applicants
          Mr.R.V.Dasalkar, AGP for the respondent-State
          Mr.Sham B. Patil, Advocate for respondent no.3
                                       ...
                                 CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 01.09.2021 PER COURT :

          1]               Heard both sides.


          2]               The applicants are the original claimants in LAR

No. 459 of 1994. Being aggrieved by the Judgment and Award passed by the Reference Court on 11.07.2013, the applicants - original claimants have preferred this Appeal, which is delayed by 1061 days.

3] Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are the agriculturists by occupation and due to financial constraint, appeal could not be filed within a period of limitation. Learned counsel submits that the applicants are also ready to forgo the interest of the delay period i.e. 1061 days.

1670.17CA+.odt

4] Learned AGP for respondent - State and learned counsel for respondent no.3 - acquiring body submit that delay has not been satisfactorily explained and thus the applications seeking condonation of delay may kindly be rejected.

5] It appears that the applicants are agriculturists by occupation and due to financial constraint, they could not prefer Appeal within a period of limitation. Furthermore, the applicants - original claimants are also ready to forgo the interest for the period of delay i.e. 1061 days.

6] In view of above and for the reasons stated in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause-B subject to the condition that the applicants shall not be entitled to claim the interest for the period of delay i.e. 1061 days in case the Appeal preferred by the applicants is allowed for enhancement of compensation.

7] Civil Application is disposed of accordingly.

[V. K. JADHAV, J.]

DDC

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter