Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16197 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 November, 2021
wp6106.19
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
...
WRIT PETITION NO.6106 OF 2019
Vaishnavi Mahila Gramin Vikas
Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha,
Yavatmal, through its President
Mrs. Sangita Khushal Dange,
aged about 49 years, r/o Plot No.27,
Shivneri Society, Yavatmal. ... Petitioner
- Versus -
1) The State of Maharashtra,
through its Principal Secretary
Department of Higher and Technical
Education, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.
2) The State of Maharashtra,
through its Principal Secretary
Department of Social Justice and Special
Assistance, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.
3) Smt. Nathibai Damodar Thackersey
(SNDT) Women's University, through
its Registrar, 1, Nathibai Thackersey
Road, Mumbai-400020. ... Respondents
......................................................................................................................
Mr. A. I. Sheikh, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. D.P. Thakare, Additional Government Pleader for respondent nos.1
and 2.
......................................................................................................................
CORAM: SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND
ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.
DATED : NOVEMBER 23, 2021 wp6106.19
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER SUNIL B.SHUKRE, J.) :
Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the
consent of the learned Counsel for the respective parties.
2) The petitioner Society is desirous of starting a new course of
Master in Social Work and the proposal of the petitioner has also been
forwarded by the Department of Higher and Technical Education,
Mantralaya, Mumbai vide its covering letter dated 7/2/2019 to the
respondent no.2.
3) Copy of the aforesaid proposal is filed on record and it discloses
that the proposal of the petitioner Society is at Sr.No.16 of the list
enclosed to the covering letter dated 7/2/2019. It is pointed out by the
learned Counsel for the petitioner that this proposal is pending for
consideration and necessary decision with respondent no.2 for a long
period of time.
4) We find substance in the submission of the learned Counsel
for the petitioner regarding long pendency of the proposal.
5) We, therefore, partly allow the petition and direct the
respondent no.2 to decide the proposal in accordance with law as
expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of two months wp6106.19
from the date of the order.
6) Rule is made absolute in the above terms. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
khj
Digitally Signed By:KAMAL HUNDRAJ
JESWANI
Signing Date:24.11.2021 11:49
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!