Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 16099 Bom
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2021
1 wp 12628.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
26 WRIT PETITION NO.12628 OF 2021
DHARMANNA LINGAPPA BELLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Pratap V. Jadhavar
AGP for Respondent No. 1: Mr. K. N. Lokhande
Advocate for Respondent No. 2: Mr. D. S. Bagul
...
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE: 22nd NOVEMBER, 2021 PER COURT: 1. Mr. Jadhavar, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that tribe claim of the petitioner was invalidated. The petitioner had
filed writ petition before this Court. This Court
confirmed the invalidation, however, granted
protection in service.
2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner
further submits that, now, the petitioner is
placed on supernumerary post by respondent no. 2.
2 wp 12628.2021 3. Mr. Bagul, learned Counsel appears for
respondent no. 2 and submits that as the tribe
certificate of the petitioner is invalidated he is
rightly placed on the supernumerary posts; as per
the policy of the State Government.
4. We have also heard the learned A.G.P. for the
State.
5. The issue is no longer res-integra. This
Court under it's Judgment and Order dated
04.05.2021 in Writ Petition No. 903 of 2020 with
connected writ petitions held that if the
protection has been granted by this Court, the
same has become final then it would not be open
for the respondent now to place the petitioners on
the supernumerary posts.
6. In light of the above and for the reasons
recorded in the Judgment and Order
dated 04.05.2021 passed in Writ Petition No. 903
of 2020 with connected writ petitions, we follow
the same course.
3 wp 12628.2021 7. In the light of above, the Government
Resolution dated 21.12.2019 shall be read in a
manner not to include the employees whose tribe
claims are invalidated, but are granted protection
in employment under the judgments/orders of this
Court and the said judgments/orders have attained
finality.
8. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned
communication placing the petitioner on
supernumerary post is quashed and set aside.
9. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No
costs.
[R. N. LADDHA, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
marathe
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!