Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sakhawat Hussain Abdul Sattar vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. The ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 15951 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 15951 Bom
Judgement Date : 17 November, 2021

Bombay High Court
Sakhawat Hussain Abdul Sattar vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. The ... on 17 November, 2021
Bench: M.S. Sonak, Pushpa V. Ganediwala
                                              1                          6 appw170.21.odt

              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

          CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPW) NO. 170 OF 2021 IN
              CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.6 OF 2020 (D)
                     Sakhawat Hussain Abdul Sattar
                                   Vs.
 State of Maharashtra, through the Additional Secretary, Ministry of Home
              Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and another
_______________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions             Court's or Judge's orders.
and Registrar's Orders.
                  Ms Sakshi Tiwari, Advocate for applicant.
                  Shri M.J. Khan, APP for non-applicants.


                  CORAM : M.S. SONAK & PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, JJ.

DATE : 17th NOVEMBER, 2021.

Ms Sakshi Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant points out that the some error have crept in the judgment and order dated 20.10.2021 and same are required to be correct for placing the record straight, the error occurred in order are typographical.

2. Accordingly, in paragraph 2 line 2 of our order, "date 04.03.2019" be substituted with "19.03.2019". Similarly, in paragraph 11 line 2, "date 1.03.2019" be substituted with "19.03.2019".

3. Save and except the aforesaid correction, no further corrections are necessary. Errors, in this case arose because the petitioner, in his petition as well as the prayer clause had referred these dates which are now found to be

2 6 appw170.21.odt

erroneous. Therefore, we grant leave to the petitioner to also amend the petition itself so that record is placed straight.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in future due care and caution will be applied in drafting the petition and citing the correct dates.

5. Necessary correction to be carried out in the original judgment and order as well as order uploaded on the official website of the Court.

6. The application stands disposed of.

(Pushpa V. Ganediwala, J.) (M.S. Sonak, J.)

Wagh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter