Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nikhilkumar Baburao Ghodke vs The State Of Maharashtra And ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 361 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 361 Bom
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021

Bombay High Court
Nikhilkumar Baburao Ghodke vs The State Of Maharashtra And ... on 7 January, 2021
Bench: S.V. Gangapurwala, Shrikant Dattatray Kulkarni
                                        1
                                                                 W.P.138-2021

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                           BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          WRIT PETITION NO. 138 OF 2021

Nikhilkumar s/o Baburao Ghodke                           ..       Petitioner

         Versus

The State of Maharashtra and ors.                        ..       Respondents

Mr Sanjay Kolhare, Advocate for petitioner
Mrs M.A. Deshpande, Addl.G.P. for respondents no.1 and 2


                                  CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
                                         SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE : 7th January 2021

PER COURT :

1. The transfer of the petitioner from unaided post to aided post

has been approved by the Deputy Director of Education / Education Officer

(Secondary), but the same has been approved as Shikshan Sevak from the

date of transfer on aided post.

2. The grievance of Mr. Kolhare, the learned counsel for petitioner

is that, the services rendered by the petitioner on unaided post are required

to be considered by the Deputy Director of Education / Education Officer

(Secondary).

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader for respondents

no.1 and 2 relies on the circular dated 28.06.2016 to contend that, approvals

can only be granted as Shikshan Sevaks from the date of transfers on aided

posts.

4. Said issue is no longer res integra in view of the judgment of

this Court in Writ Petition No. 1493 of 2018 with other connected writ

petitions decided under order dated 04th July, 2019. It has been considered

W.P.138-2021

by us that the services rendered on unaided posts will have to be considered

while granting approval. If the petitioner has rendered services on unaided

post before his transfer on aided post, then the approval has to be granted

considering the services rendered on unaided post.

5. In the present cases, the petitioner is transferred on rendering

service on unaided post for 2 and 1/2 years.

6. In the result, the impugned order granting approval to the

petitioner as Shikshan Sevak from the date of transfer to the aided post is

quashed and set aside to that extent only. The Deputy Director of

Education / Education Officer (Secondary) while granting the approval to the

petitioner as Shikshan Sevak on the aided post, shall consider the services

rendered by the petitioner on unaided post. To illustrate, if, the petitioner has

rendered services on unaided post for two years and is transferred to aided

post, his services will be approved as Shikshan Sevak for one year from the

date of transfer and thereafter as a Assistant Teacher. The Deputy Director

of Education / Education Officer (Secondary) shall consider the proposal

and give approval as directed above.

7. In view of the above, the writ petition is partly allowed in above

terms. No costs.

( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)

vvr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter