Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1015 Bom
Judgement Date : 15 January, 2021
1/4 20.mca.1269.18.(Judg)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1269 OF 2018
Sau. Shweta Yogesh Kawalkar
Aged 30 Years, Occupation - Nil;
Resident at - C/o Vitthalrao Ramkrushna
Bhele, Shiv Colony, Near Vinayak School,
Amravati, Tahsil and District Amravati. ... APPLICANT
VERSUS
Yogesh Namdeorao Kawalkar
Aged 36 Years, Occupation - Engineer
and in service, Resident at - 46, Kabir
Nagar, Nandanwan Main Road, Beside ... NON-APPLICANT
Jankidevi Jaiswal School, Nagpur.
Mr. M. G. Rathi, Advocate for Applicant.
Ms. S. N. Deshpande, Advocate for Non-applicant.
CORAM : MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, J.
DATE : JANUARY 15, 2021.
JUDGMENT
. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with
consent of the learned Counsel for both sides.
2/4 20.mca.1269.18.(Judg)
2. By this Application, Applicant seeks transfer of Petition
No.A-938/2017 pending on the file of Family Court No.3, Nagpur to
the Family Court at Amravati.
3. The Non-applicant has filed Application under Section 9 of
Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights in Family Court at
Nagpur. The case of the Applicant is that, she is legally wedded wife of
the Non-applicant. The marriage between the parties took place on 18 th
January, 2017 at Amravati and after marriage the Applicant started
residing with the Non-applicant at Nagpur. However, as the dispute
arose between the parties, Applicant was constrained to leave the
house of the Non-applicant. The Applicant is staying with her parents
at Amravati since 29/3/2017. The Non-applicant has filed the petition
for restitution of conjugal rights before the Family Court at Nagpur.
Significantly, the Applicant - wife has filed the counter-claim in the
said petition for restitution of conjugal rights. It appears that both the
parties are interested in staying together.
4. Mr. Rathi, the learned Counsel for Applicant contended that
since the Applicant is not earning at present and her financial condition
3/4 20.mca.1269.18.(Judg)
is not sound, it is difficult for her to travel from Amravati to Nagpur for
attending each and every date in the said case. Therefore, she prayed
for transfer of the petition filed by the Non-applicant for restitution of
conjugal rights in Family Court, Nagpur to Family Court, Amravati.
5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Sumita Singh V/s
Kumar Sanjay & Anr. Reported in AIR 2002 SC 396 has observed that
wife's convenience must be considered in matrimonial proceedings,
particularly when the husband has filed the petition against her.
6. Considering the aforesaid circumstances, it would be just
and proper to transfer the proceedings under Section 9 of the Hindu
Marriage Act i.e. Petition No.A-938/2017 pending on the file of Family
Court, Nagpur to the Family Court at Amravati. Hence, the following
order.
ORDER
(i) Misc. Civil Application No. 1269 of 2018 is allowed.
(ii) The proceedings i.e. Petition No. A-938/2017 pending on the
file of Family Court, Nagpur is hereby transferred to the Family
Court at Amravati.
4/4 20.mca.1269.18.(Judg)
(iii) Parties to appear before the Family Court at Amravati on
16/2/2021.
(iv) The Family Court, Amravati is requested to take steps into this
proceedings for reconciliation of both the parties.
7. Rule is made absolute in aforesaid terms. There shall be no
order as to costs.
[MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, J.] Yadav VG
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!