Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2835 Bom
Judgement Date : 11 February, 2021
8960-2019-CA.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8960 OF 2019
IN SA/430/2019
Namdev s/o Daulatrao Suryawanshi and another ... Applicants
Versus
Sanjay s/o Raghunathrao Matlakute ... Respondent
..........
Mr. S. K. Chavan, Advocate for applicants.
Mr. K. P. Rodge, Advocate for respondent.
..........
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.
DATE : 11th February, 2021 ORDER :- . Present application has been filed for injunction. 2. Heard both sides.
3. The applicants/ appellants in both cases are Plaintiffs' in Regular
Civil Suit No. 364 of 2006 which came to be dismissed on 16.09.2011. It
was filed for declaration and injunction. The Regular Civil Appeal No.
102 of 2011 challenging the said judgment and decree before the
learned Principal District Judge, Parbhani came to be dismissed on
08.05.2019. There is no evidence produced by the applicants that they
had sought interim injunction throughout both the proceedings and
8960-2019-CA.odt
even after the pronouncement of judgment and decree passed by the
learned First Appellate Court. Under such circumstance, no case is made
out for grant of injunction during the pendency of second appeal.
Second appeal is admitted, but that will not give applicants a right to get
temporary injunction. Hence, application stands rejected.
[SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.]
scm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!