Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri. Satyanarayan Bhoot ... vs Divisional Commissioner, ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 2662 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2662 Bom
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2021

Bombay High Court
Shri. Satyanarayan Bhoot ... vs Divisional Commissioner, ... on 10 February, 2021
Bench: V.M. Deshpande
Judgment

                                                                    wp4117.17 10

                                       1

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
                    NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

                      WRIT PETITION NO.4117 OF 2017

Shri Satyanarayan Bhoot Charitable
Trust, Regd.No.E-74, Through its
Chairman Smt.Kirandevi Ajaykumar
Agrawal, aged about 64 years, occupation : Nil,
R/o Umarsara, Yavatmal, taluka and district
Yavatmal.                                 ..... Petitioner.

                                :: V E R S U S ::

1. Divisional Commissioner,
Amravati.

2. Additional Collector, Yavatmal,
Taluka and District Yavatmal.

3. Shri Rajesh Maganlal Rai,
Aged about 45 years, occupation : business,
R/o Balaji Square, Yavatmal,
Taluka and district Yavatmal.

4. Shri Chandrashekant Avinash Salokar,
Aged about 45 years, occupation business,
R/o Gandhi Nagar, taluka digras, district Yavatmal.

5. Sub Divisional Officer, Yavatmal,
Taluka and District Yavatmal.             ..... Respondents.
===================================
Shri S.S.Shingne, Counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Nalin Majithia, Counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4.
Mrs.Mrunal Barabde, AGP for respondent Nos.1,2, & 5.
===================================


                                                                            .....2/-




 ::: Uploaded on - 12/02/2021                       ::: Downloaded on - 12/02/2021 21:01:50 :::
 Judgment

                                                                          wp4117.17 10

                                           2

                CORAM           : V.M.DESHPANDE, J.
                DATE            : FEBRUARY 10, 2021

ORAL JUDGMENT

1.             Heard       learned   counsel Shri S.S.Shingne                 for the

petitioner, learned counsel Shri Nalin Majithia for respondent Nos.3

and 4, and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mrs.Mrunal

Barabde for respondent Nos.1,2, and 5.


2.             The petitioner, which is a trust registered under the

Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, having its registration No.E-74,

through its Chairman, approached to this Court challenging order

dated 5.6.2017 in Appeal No.06/NAP-34/Umarsara-Yavatmal/2017-

18 passed by respondent No.1/the Divisional Commissioner,

Amravati dismissing the appeal filed on behalf of the petitioner-trust

as infructuous.


3.             According        to   the       petitioner-trust,     it    purchased

agricultural land admeasuring 11 acres from and out of survey No.9

on 7.4.1960 by a registered conveyance in its favour. In the said

conveyance deed, a road was shown from northern boundary



                                                                                 .....3/-




 ::: Uploaded on - 12/02/2021                            ::: Downloaded on - 12/02/2021 21:01:50 :::
 Judgment

                                                                wp4117.17 10

                                     3

between survey No.9 and the adjoining land. It is submission of the

petitioner-trust that respondent Nos.3 and 4 purchased survey

No.9/1-A on 16.7.2004.          It is submission of the petitioner that

though in the joint measurement it is shown that the road which is

described in the sale deed of the petitioner-trust is part and parcel of

the land of respondent Nos.3 and 4, in the sale deed of respondent

Nos.3 and 4 does not show any road.


4.             When this fact was come in the knowledge of petitioner-

trust in the year 2006, the petitioner-trust filed a suit bearing

Regular Civil Suit No.140/2005 claiming decree of permanent

injunction. The temporary injunction was not granted in favour of

the petitioner-trust. Resultantly, the petitioner-trust approached to

Appellate Court and as per submission of learned counsel for the

petitioner, on 21.6.2010 learned District Judge-2, Yavatmal directed

parties to maintain status quo. At Bar, a submission is made that the

suit is still pending.


5.             Be that as it may, on 19.1.2015 respondent Nos.3 and 4

applied before the Sub Divisional Officer, Yavatmal seeking


                                                                        .....4/-




 ::: Uploaded on - 12/02/2021                   ::: Downloaded on - 12/02/2021 21:01:50 :::
 Judgment

                                                                    wp4117.17 10

                                       4

permission for converting their agricultural land in dispute into non

agricultural one and as per submission, the Sub Divisional Officer

without verifying title granted permission and thereby converted

land in dispute of respondent Nos.3 and 4 to non-agricultural one.

The petitioner-trust questioned the said by filing an appeal before

the Additional Collector, Yavatmal.         On 4.2.2017, the appeal was

disposed of by the Additional Collector filed by the petitioner-trust.

Being aggrieved thereby, the petitioner-trust approached to the

Divisional Commissioner, Amravati by filing an appeal in which the

impugned order is passed.


6.             I have perused impugned order dated 5.6.2017 passed

by the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati. The order sans a detailed

reasoning.         The      appeal   was   dismissed   by     the    Divisional

Commissioner as infructuous because of pendency of the regular civil

suit. In my view, proceeding filed by respondent Nos.3 and 4 for

obtaining permission for conversion of agricultural land into non-

agricultural one is independent one. The suit filed by the petitioner-

trust was for claiming permanent injunction against defendants



                                                                           .....5/-




 ::: Uploaded on - 12/02/2021                      ::: Downloaded on - 12/02/2021 21:01:50 :::
 Judgment

                                                                 wp4117.17 10

                                       5

therein that they shall not interfere with peaceful possession and

enjoyment of the land in their possession.


7.             The order passed by the Sub Divisional Officer was of

converting the disputed land from agricultural land to non-

agricultural one.           In this view of the matter, the Divisional

Commissioner ought to have decided the appeal filed by the

petitioner-trust on its own merits rather than disposing the appeal as

infructuous. Since there is no order deciding the appeal on its own

merits, the matter will have to be remitted back. In the result, I pass

following order:


                                    ORDER

(1) The writ petition is allowed.

(2) The order dated 5.6.2017 passed by the Divisional Commissioner,

Amravati in Appeal No.06/NAP-34/Umarsara-Yavatmal/2017-18 is

hereby quashed and set aside.

(3) Appeal No.06/NAP-34/Umarsara-Yavatmal/2017-18 is restored

to the file of the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati who shall decide

.....6/-

Judgment

wp4117.17 10

the said appeal in accordance with law by giving an opportunity to

the petitioner-trust as well as to respondent Nos.3 and 4.

(4) The petitioner-trust as well as respondent Nos.3 and 4 shall

appear before the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati on 9.3.2021

and the said Authority shall decide the appeal within a period of six

months from the date of first appearance of parties before it.

With this, the Rule is made absolute in aforesaid terms.

No costs.

JUDGE

!! BRW !!

...../-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter