Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2052 Bom
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2021
1/4 50.mca.1032.2019.(Judg)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1032 OF 2019
Kaveri Alias Bipin Sathe
(Kaveri Prasad Bharati)
Aged about 25 Years, Occu - Household;
Resident at - Behind Petrol Pump,
Pratapnagar, New Collector Colony,
Watika Vihas, Tahsil and District Nagpur. ... APPLICANT
VERSUS
Bipin s/o Vilas Sathe
Aged 30 Years, Occupation - Business;
Resident at - Robert Joseph House No.
2/2/18, Shantipura, Aurangabad. ... RESPONDENT
Mr. R. A. Bhoyar, (Appointed) Advocate for Applicant.
None for the Non-applicant.
CORAM : MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 1, 2021.
JUDGMENT
. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with
consent of the learned (Appointed) Counsel for Applicant. None
appears for the Non-applicant though served.
2/4 50.mca.1032.2019.(Judg)
2. By this Application, Applicant seeks transfer of the Petition
No. A/277/2018 pending on the file of Family Court, Aurangabad to
Family Court at Nagpur.
3. The marriage between the Applicant and the Respondent
solemnized at Nagpur on 26th October, 2017 as per the custom and
rites prevailing in Christian religion. It is alleged that the Respondent
illtreated the Applicant on the count of dowry. It is alleged that the
Respondent drove the Applicant from her matrimonial home, therefore,
she was constrained to stay with her widow mother at Nagpur, who is a
labourer.
4. The Respondent has filed Petition for restitution of conjugal
rights bearing Petition No. A/277/2018 before the Family Court at
Aurangabad. It is submitted that the Applicant is not in a sound
financial condition to attend each and every date from Nagpur to the
Family Court at Aurangabad. It is, therefore, requested to transfer the
Petition filed by the Respondent bearing No. A/277/2018 from the
Family Court at Aurangabad to the Family Court at Nagpur.
3/4 50.mca.1032.2019.(Judg)
5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Sumita Singh V/s
Kumar Sanjay & Anr. Reported in AIR 2002 SC 396 has observed that
wife's convenience must be considered in matrimonial proceedings,
particularly when the husband has filed the petition against her.
6. Considering the fact that the Applicant is not in a sound
financial condition to attend each and every date at Family Court,
Aurangabad, which is far away from Nagpur City, so also it is well
settled that wife's convenience must be considered in matrimonial
proceedings, particularly when the husband has filed the petition
against her, it would be just and proper to transfer the Petition No.
A/277/2018 pending on the file of Family Court at Aurangabad to the
Family Court at Nagpur. Hence, the following order.
ORDER
(i) Misc. Civil Application No. 1032 of 2019 is allowed.
(ii) The Petition No. A/277/2018 pending on the file of the Family
Court at Aurangabad is hereby transferred to the Family Court at
Nagpur.
4/4 50.mca.1032.2019.(Judg)
(iii) Parties to appear before the Family Court at Nagpur on 22 nd
February, 2021.
(iv) Advocate Fees of the learned (Appointed) Counsel for the
Applicant be quantified by the High Court Legal Services Sub-
Committee, Nagpur, as per the rules.
7. Rule is made absolute in aforesaid terms. There shall be no
order as to costs.
[MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, J.] Yadav VG
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!