Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17775 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2021
1/4 Judg.32.wp.2278.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 2278 OF 2021
Parth s/o Rahul Narsing
Age 18 years (completed), Occupation -
Education, Resident at - Plot No.57,
Swagat, Saptagiri Nagar, Pusad 445 204.
District Yavatmal. ... PETITIONER
VERSUS
District Caste Certificate Scrutiny
Committee, Yavatmal.
Through its President/Secretary
Office at - Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar
Social Justice Bhavan, Kalaswadi Camp,
Darwha Road, Yavatmal. ... RESPONDENT
Mr. S. K. Tambde, Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr. A. A. Madiwale, AGP for Respondent.
CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE &
ANIL L. PANSARE, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 21, 2021.
2/4 Judg.32.wp.2278.2021
ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.]
. Heard Mr. Tambde, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner
and Mr. Madiwale, the learned AGP for Respondent - Committee.
2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by
consent of the learned Counsel for the respective parties.
3. Although the proceedings for cancellation of validity
certificate which granted to Ku. Siddhi Rajendra Bande, the cousin of
the Petitioner are being initiated as per the impugned order, still we are
of the opinion that the Respondent - Committee can reconsider the
whole matter, as the Petitioner has subsequently come across a few
more validity certificates granted to his cousins and other relatives
from the paternal family. These validities stand in the name of Ku.
Surbhi Mahesh Narsing and Mayur Mahesh Narsing both issued by
Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati and Vipul Vikas
Narsing and Ku. Purva Pramod Narsing, both issued by Caste
Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Yavatmal and also few more persons.
3/4 Judg.32.wp.2278.2021
4. Since more validity certificates have been granted to the
members in the paternal family of the Petitioner, we are of the opinion
that the issue cannot be allowed to be settled finally for the Petitioner,
unless it is examined afresh in the light of the new evidence which has
come to the fore or otherwise an irreparable harm would occur to the
future claims and aspirations of the petitioner.
5. In this view of the matter, this Petition deserves to be partly
allowed.
6. The Writ Petition is partly allowed.
7. The impugned order is hereby quashed and set aside.
8. The matter is remanded back to the Respondent -
Committee for its fresh consideration and decision in accordance with
law.
9. The Petitioner is given liberty to file additional evidence
before the Respondent -Committee.
4/4 Judg.32.wp.2278.2021
10. The Respondent - Committee is directed to decide the caste
claim of the Petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within
three months from the date of appearance of the Petitioner before it.
11. The Petitioner to appear before the Committee on 3 rd
January, 2022.
12. Rule in above terms. No costs.
(ANIL L. PANSARE J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.) Yadav VG
Digitally Signed ByVIJAYA GOURISHANKAR YADAV Signing Date:21.12.2021 17:19
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!