Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vijay Eknath Chorge vs The State Of Maharashtra
2021 Latest Caselaw 6665 Bom

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6665 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 April, 2021

Bombay High Court
Vijay Eknath Chorge vs The State Of Maharashtra on 23 April, 2021
Bench: R.P. Mohite-Dere
                                                        12a. IA 1255-21 in APEAL 367-2021.doc


                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                             INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1255 OF 2021
                                                   IN
                                 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 367 OF 2021


            Vijay Eknath Chorge                                    ...Appellant
                 Versus
            State of Maharashtra                                   ...Respondent

            Mr. Kalpesh V. Patil for the Appellant.

            Mr. S.V.Gavand, A.P.P for the Respondent-State.



                                             CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
                                             DATE : 23rd APRIL, 2021
                                            (Through Video Conferencing)
            P.C. :



            1.             Heard learned Counsel for the parties.



            2.             By this application, the applicant seeks suspension of his

            sentence and enlargement on bail, pending the hearing and final disposal of

            his appeal.



            3.             The applicant, vide judgment and order dated 31/03/2021

Wakodikar                                                                                          1/5



             ::: Uploaded on - 26/04/2021                     ::: Downloaded on - 08/09/2021 08:39:22 :::
                                                      12a. IA 1255-21 in APEAL 367-2021.doc


            passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case

            No.41 of 2016, has been convicted and sentenced as under:-

                   -       for the offence punishable under Section 279 of the Indian

                   Penal Code, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 3 months and to pay

                   fine of Rs.500/-, in default to undergo further simple imprisonment

                   for 8 days;

                   -       for the offence punishable under Section 304-II of the Indian

                   Penal Code, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 4 years and to pay

                   fine of Rs.2,000/-,       in default, to undergo further simple

                   imprisonment for 1 months;


                   -       for the offence punishable under Section 338 of the Indian

                   Penal Code, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 year and to pay

                   fine of Rs.500/-, in default, to undergo further simple imprisonment

                   for 8 days;


                   -       for the offence punishable under Section 337 of the Indian

                   Penal Code, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 3 months and to pay

                   fine of Rs.500/-, in default, to undergo further simple imprisonment

                   for 8 days;




Wakodikar                                                                                       2/5



             ::: Uploaded on - 26/04/2021                  ::: Downloaded on - 08/09/2021 08:39:22 :::
                                                        12a. IA 1255-21 in APEAL 367-2021.doc


                   -       for the offence punishable under Section 184 of the Motor

                   Vehicles Act, 1988, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 year and to

                   pay fine of Rs.500/-,         in default, to undergo further simple

                   imprisonment for 8 days;


                   -       for the offence punishable under Section 134(1)(a) & (b) of

                   the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, sentenced to pay fine of Rs.100/-, in

                   default, to undergo further simple imprisonment for 2 days;


                           All the substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently.


            4.             It is not in dispute that the applicant was on bail, pending trial

            and that he has not abused or misused his liberty whilst on bail. The appeal

            has been admitted by a separate order passed today, in the aforesaid appeal.

            The maximum sentence imposed is 4 years. The sentence is a short term

            sentence and the appeal is not likely to be heard in the immediate near

            future. Even otherwise, arguable questions have been raised by the learned

            Counsel for the applicant.



            5.             Considering the aforesaid, the application is allowed and the

            applicant's sentence is suspended and he is enlarged on bail, pending the

            hearing and final disposal of his appeal, on the following terms and

Wakodikar                                                                                          3/5



             ::: Uploaded on - 26/04/2021                     ::: Downloaded on - 08/09/2021 08:39:22 :::
                                                             12a. IA 1255-21 in APEAL 367-2021.doc


             conditions :-

                                                     ORDER

i) The applicant be released on cash bail in the sum of

Rs.20,000/-, for a period of eight weeks;

ii) The applicant shall within the said period of eight weeks,

furnish P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/-, with one or two sureties in

the like amount;

iii) The applicant shall report to the trial Court, once in six months

on the day/date specified by the trial Court, till his appeal is finally

disposed of;

iv) The applicant shall keep the trial Court informed of his

current address and mobile contact number and/or change of residence or

mobile details, if any, from time to time;

v) If there are two consecutive defaults in appearing before the

trial Court, the learned Judge shall make a report to the High Court and the

prosecution would be at liberty to file an application seeking cancellation

of bail.

Wakodikar 4/5

12a. IA 1255-21 in APEAL 367-2021.doc

6. The application is accordingly disposed of.

7. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Wakodikar                                                                                         5/5




 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter