Citation : 2016 Latest Caselaw 3023 Bom
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2016
1 wp1231.08
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO.1231 OF 2008
M/s. Chaitanyawadi Urban Credit
Co-operative Society Ltd.,
Near Ramana Maruti, Ramana Maruti
Nagar, Umred Road, Nagpur,
through its President. ig .... PETITIONER
VERSUS
1) The Learned Fourth Labour Court
at Nagpur, Near Hislop College,
Temple Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur.
2) Shri Ramesh s/o Udaram Bokade,
R/o Dhanwantari Nagar, Behind
Panchavati Ashram, Umred Road,
Nagpur. .... RESPONDENT
______________________________________________________________
Shri N.W. Almelkar, Advocate for the petitioner,
Shri K.R. Lule, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No.1,
Shri S.R. Bhongade, Advocate for the respondent No.2
______________________________________________________________
CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.
DATED : 20 JUNE, 2016 th
ORAL JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri N.W. Almelkar, Advocate for the petitioner-
employer, Shri K.R. Lule, Assistant Government Pleader for the
2 wp1231.08
respondent No.1 and Shri S.R. Bhongade, Advocate for the respondent
No.2-employee.
2. The employer filed this petition challenging the order
passed by the Labour Court allowing the application filed by the
employee under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
and directing the employer to pay Rs.67,807/- to the employee. This
Court, by the order dated 03-04-2008, issued Rule and stayed the
effect, operation and execution of the order passed by the Labour
Court on condition that the employer deposits the amount with the
Registry of this Court. The employer has deposited the amount and it
is kept in nationalised bank in fixed deposit.
3. The employer has given up the challenges raised in the
petition on merits of the matter.
The only submission made on behalf of the petitioner is
that subsequently the employee was dismissed and the complaint filed
by the employee is also dismissed by the Labour Court, and that the
employer has filed dispute before the Co-operative Court against the
employee for recovery of amount of Rs.1,18,000/- and interest on it
and the dispute is pending since 2007. The learned Advocate has
3 wp1231.08
submitted that if the employee is permitted to withdraw the amount
deposited by the employer before this Court, then even if the employer
succeeds before the Co-operative Court, it will not be possible for it to
recover the amount from the employee.
4. In the circumstances, the following order is passed :
(i)
The Co-operative Court is directed to decide the Dispute
No.166/2007 filed by the present petitioner till
06-01-2017.
(ii) The amount of Rs.67,807/- deposited by the petitioner
with the Registry of this Court shall be continued in the
nationalised bank in fixed deposit, until further orders.
(iii) The parties are granted liberty to move application for
payment of the amount, after the disposal of the dispute
by the Co-operative Court.
(iv) The petition is disposed in the above terms.
(v) In the circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs.
JUDGE
adgokar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!