Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8966 AP
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2024
APHC010071662005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI [3369]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 1038/2005
Between:
Sri Venkatarama Modern Rice Mill ...APPELLANT
AND
Surapaneni Purnachandra Rao ...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.MEKA RAJASEKHARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent:
1.CHALLA GUNARANJAN The Court made the following judgment:
No representation on behalf of the appellant despite listing
the matter under the caption 'for dismissal'.
This Court on 10.09.2024 directed the appellant to take
steps to get substituted copy of I.A. No.03 of 2008, but no steps
have been taken. It seems that the appellant has no interest in
prosecuting the appeal.
In the result, this second appeal is dismissed for default.
No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending
consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed.
_______________________ T MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J SS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!