Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Muniammal vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh,
2024 Latest Caselaw 8144 AP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8144 AP
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2024

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Smt. Muniammal vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 9 September, 2024

                                     1

APHC010355172024
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                   AT AMARAVATI                [3328]
                            (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                   MONDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
                     TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

                                 PRESENT

   THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA
                         PRASAD

                      WRIT PETITION NO: 18105 OF 2024

Between:

  1. SMT. MUNIAMMAL, W/O.CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
     123 B, MOORES ROAD, SWADANDRA NAGAR      AND HUTS,
     THOSUAND LIGHTS.VTC GREAMS ROAD, PO GREAMS ROAD,
     SUB DISTRICT CHENNAI,      DISTRICT CHENNAI, STATE
     TAMILANDU, PIN CODE 600006

                                                        ...PETITIONER

                                   AND

  1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
     SECRETARY,      REVENUE DEPARTMENT,    SECRETARIAT
     BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT.

  2. THE COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF STAMPS
     AND REGISTRATION, 5-59, R K SPRING VALLEY APARTMENTS,
     EDUPUGALLU, KANKIPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

  3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.

  4. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.

  5. THE TAHSILDAR, RENIGUNTA, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT

  6. THE SUBREGISTRAR, RENIGUNTA, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.

                                                   ...RESPONDENT(S):
                                         2



Counsel for the Petitioner:

   1. NAGENDRA BABU PARAGATI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

   1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS

ORDER:

Heard Sri Nagendra Babu Paragati, learned Counsel for the Writ

Petitioner and Sri Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader.

2. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner has submitted that the

Writ Petitioner has purchased property and has submitted the sale deed for

registration before the Sub-Registrar, Renigunta, Tirupathi District

(Respondent No.6). It is the case of the Writ Petitioner that the Sub-Registrar,

Renigunta, Tirupathi District (Respondent No.6) has declined to accept the

said sale deed, dated 05.08.2024 (Ex.P.3). It is the submission of the learned

Counsel for the Petitioner that the Sub-Registrar, Renigunta, Tirupathi District

(Respondent No.6) has declined to receive the said sale deed and process

the same. He would submit that no reason was given by the said Sub-

Registrar, Renigunta, Tirupathi District (Respondent No.6) for declining to

receive the said documents and process the same.

3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has placed reliance on the

judgment of this Court in Salimeni Ravindra Vs. The State of Andhra

Pradesh & Ors. (W.P.No.10392 of 2021 dated 15.06.2021). He would place

reliance on this judgment to submit that the Sub-Registrar cannot refuse to

receive the document presented for registration. He would submit that as per

Section 71 of the Registration Act, 1908, there is an obligation on the

Registrar/Sub-Registrar to process the sale deed and either register the same

or record reasons for refusal to registrar a document which is presented for

registration and issue an order of refusal and record his reasons for refusal in

Book No.2 with the endorsement of the phrase "registration refused" on the

presented document for registration. This procedure is followed as per Rules

161 to 164 of the Rules framed under the Registration Act, 1908.

4. This Court, having perused the judgment of this Court in Salimeni

Ravindra's case (W.P.No.10392 of 2021 dated 15.06.2021), is of the view that

the present case is squarely covered by the said judgment. Accordingly, this

Writ Petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Sub-Registrar,

Renigunta, Tirupathi District (Respondent No.6) to receive the sale deed

dated 05.08.2024 (Ex.P.3) and process the same in accordance with the

procedure as indicated and as dealt with in this judgment dated 15.06.2021 in

W.P.No.10392 of 2021.

5. The Writ Petitioner is directed to submit a copy of this order along

with the photo copy of the judgment of this Court which is relied-on i.e.,

Salimeni Ravindra's case (W.P.No.10392 of 2021 dated 15.06.2021) to the

Registrar for better appreciation and for following the procedure in accordance

with law in future cases as well.

6. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands

disposed of. Needless to state that on presentation of the sale deed, the Sub-

Registrar namely the Sub-Registrar, Renigunta, Tirupathi District (Respondent

No.6) shall pass a Speaking Order as per law within a period of four weeks in

the event he/she is not inclined to register the document. No order as to costs.

7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this

order.

______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 09.09.2024 Mnr

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

WRIT PETITION No.18105 OF 2024

Dt.09.09.2024 Mnr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter