Shaik Abdul Rouf vs P. Sreenivasa Rao
2024 Latest Caselaw 9947 AP

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Shaik Abdul Rouf vs P. Sreenivasa Rao on 6 November, 2024

by
o
Ces

on

LUTISTANCaS
fo
O20
ge

'le

iroumetan

Gs £3 fed

igh Court may be

dent Judgment Debtor
re
8
of
pans

NT RAN AKRISHNA PRASAD
3,
Rey. Petitioner/Oecree Holder
aied SO-01-2024 passed in

<
= seca
x seen oo f
e id me mB ae OD S ® eG
mg 3 BF pte gy eB is oh Daf
owe ke oe me ge O o & an ns tee fn ng
: Lit es 13, £e% Se " a Sonus ~ tou, a Je aS te at
Few ee 0% i, © 7 ne on ee aes ME nr Oy ENS
ak, eae ES: an i Be epee i v ce ES ft 2 set es, oS "
ee * hha ni en os ° "4 vies ty
wpe gh or Sk, Be oS a ass a Se 3 8
we en oe we ras ", me % ope ie ke tS me
BT ee % ana Sh ef te. FS " & we
f is 3 4 os Fe i se ne Ce i ar cd yy, wh a
os my Bes Ess onl fe res oe " " 4 ra oe oh aes |B %
"a ; Rng * ae y es fape en ay ves
es , thd gt, 3 ir oat Bed eed Pie % yn "4 LE shy on it
3, pee pe ws oo % tot we thee toe Boo fee wet % a ten GD ba,
ii le Se a Be 4 i -  g She pe ion of So oh
ie a ar oy . ed mi Z wie win ie oe, asl rs ts
Be py bo em Be = aus 5 ns (oR A LF a a
em C3 eo i he pa mes? G @ Lb oe Bes & BR
be nape ¢ me es on wines Ms ape <A &,
phos POF ibd ae ; & a i a aaa 3 SS we &G Roo oh. rack 2 a haa
EO age SS Be Ee hea OS "a t © . B® an Go me =o
P26 US eB oe GB fe OF A a a we
CE TON BA ney So few. Oe ™ er 3 ' , fret Seng Rew "net doe ne es %B
ED Mossad im, £3 322 See te " re te rast . os Bo ch f oe is
c 5 fn Phe tit eee "en Se ad %% oe inn dee ED ae [a ey 6%
Lb cy Oo Hs i . ae & & . wy SOME we eS
He To op Bek me Boe TB fs nF ipo tye eo BE
oa ae: ae oe & a ce: ™ ix i e we " FO
oe, ns 7 igh on ey Le Ke ye oe yee os tgere ;
be tom 9 a & te fe Se 8 © Bh Se Bo og
mo ve wn, eee an wd pe AS Ay OS git i ee
rt Pm San secin GP Jo py hm CR te Fen ts & 5 a £4 % a Sn 5
sno % tho 6 -e Ay CE DG CR G wo ' jhe
og, Be bs O fs 5 ie an ans Ae &
13 4 AA hy fe a we & tf, hs Be dew a3 (3 Go to Me ay
wp hd Be 7" fo) Bo ee re st th.
Be a. a whe is » Gm & oS 5 S @
a: ; ae i rm eh eS et *% Ce A ES
$p a2 #2 8 ee °© 2 62, ,. 6  @ SB & &
oo ed #8, £% ee fh, ot > fg or nn ns arn 2
3 ir 5a P ~ rn ot a a 4 Fy tH * i] pm Oe Sp Ben
voced pawns és 03 r% ewe C3 fone od we ee "3 fer.
om ot se 3 ye Nt [n eS Pea mB &
es; a] wg fee 4 C3 rng oh . 3 on ee
oad Ce: a bay iy oS ea a a> Maca " i. G3 iss i 33 4
wp se 2 8 eB Gt OR wa o © PF & o Bw es
oe me OM ge 2 oe £oG 5 we O&O £ Bs tne
eR 3 = Oo @B & eo gc oe a eg
= 6 % G » 2 & nO of = OD wR
Bo x + @ @ fag "3 we ra «oe © 2B w
iL nn fe Go # s ep
on <> th Ss fe art eS yw Fz Zz ns Be
nr in oo 2 OU te .
feo a oT eS fe mM 'ed 6% = (aD
. Sooo ae oft > ae ke we wae
mf x UE ty ms mel p Wg Sy

alia
nM



the Revision Petiioner.

Wyong
'eft
reo

tb

drawn the attention of

Court fo €

O.3.No, 150

iS

2

th

sot

?
3

ine
oe
6
be
hen
ae
oh
"ages
°
wo
Q
Sod
toe

Ralampet. Ne |

RY

;

*
th
oS
ye
Saben,

@

%
&

ah

<

Malang

&,
>
Mw

'fake out Personal

§, Learne

week fram today

uy

O-LLSRI DE

Ss
ASSISTANT R

EVE
ISTRAR

g5
3

Pad
~

e
joo



HIGH GOURT ,

GREP, J

DATED OG 1/2026

LIST THE MATTER ON

ORDER

re 'oe

GRP No. f888 of 2084

SEEN ES SS Sis, Re

we SB,

INTERIAY SUSPENSION

See ws Ie See