Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7941 AP
Judgement Date : 30 August, 2024
APHC010376462003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
[3369]
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 276/2003
Between:
V.Satyavathi, West Godavari District. ...APPELLANT
AND
Murali Chakrapani Balaramam and 7 Others
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. S SUBBA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents:
1.
The Court made the following Judgment:
This appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C against the
Decree and Judgment in A.S.No.45 of 1995 dated 04.10.2002 on
the file of Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem confirmed the
decree and Judgment in O.S.No.465 of 1987 on the file of
Principal Munsif Magistrate, Tadepalligudem dated 12.10.1995.
02. As the learned counsel appearing for appellant is elevated
as Judge, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, this Court ordered
notice to the appellant, but the notice was returned with
endorsement as 'insufficient address'. As seen from the envelop,
it is addressed to the appellant as per the address shown in the
appeal. In these facts of the case, this Court has no other option,
except to dismiss the appeal.
03. In the result, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default.
No order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any, stand closed.
____________________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Date :30.08.2024 GRL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!