Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shaik Mohammad Mamu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh
2024 Latest Caselaw 7262 AP

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7262 AP
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2024

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Shaik Mohammad Mamu vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 19 August, 2024

APHC010342572024      IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
                                  PRADESH
                               AT AMARAVATI               [3368]
                        (Special Original Jurisdiction)

        MONDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF AUGUST
           TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

                   PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI

                   CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5507/2024
Between:
  1. SHAIK MOHAMMAD @ MAMU, S/O KHAZARVALI SHAIK,
     AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RESIDENT
     OF D.NO.21-6-19/58, GAJULAPALEM, PONNUR TOWN
     AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
  2. . MOHAMMAD ABDUL MAHAMOOD @ MOHAMMED, S/O
     M.A.RABBANI,      AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC
     BUSINESS,         RESIDENT    OF   D.NO.21-6-59/1,
     GAJULAPALEM,       PONNUR TOWN AND MANDAL,
     GUNTUR DISTRICT.
  3. SHAIK SHOWKAT @ GOLD SHOP SHOWKATH, S/O
     LATE SHAIK ALI, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC
     BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.22-10-6, ITIKAMPADU
     ROAD, PONNUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
  4. SHAIK MOOMINU BASHA @ RABBANI @ ARATI,, S/O
     MOHAMUD SUBHANI, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS.
     RESIDENT OF H.NO.25-13-7/8, ITIKAMPADU ROAD,
     PONNUR TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
  5. SHAIK MAHABUB SUBHANI @ RAHAMAN @ APOOT,,
     S/O SHAIK AMEER JANI, OCC BUSINESS, RESIDENT
     OF D.NO.21-1-9/2, APJ ABDUL KALAM ROAD, PONNUR
     TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
  6. SHAIK ANNA KASIM @ NANNA KHASIM, S/O GOKARBE
     BI,   AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,
     RESIDENT OF D.NO.5-7-3, CABINPETA, NIDUBROLU,
     PONNUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
  7. SHAIK RAHAMAN @ SUBHANI @ LALA, S/O SHAIK
     MASTHAN, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS,
                                 2
                                                                BVLNC,J
                                                   Crl.P.No.5507 of 2024


     RESIDENT    OF      D.NO.20-19-15,   27TH  WARD,
     ITIKAMPADU ROAD, PONNUR TOWN AND MANDAL,
     GUNTUR DISTRICT.
                              ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
                           AND
  1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS
     PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P AT
     AMARAVATHI.
  2. SHAIK JAFFAR, S/O ABDUL KHADER, AGED ABOUT 37
     YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.2-4-8/3,
     MOLLAVARI STREET,         4TH WARD, DUFFPETA,
     PONNUR TOWN AND MANDAL,
                      ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
  1. KUMARA RATNAM TENNETI

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
  1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
  2. VUTUPALLI RAJANNA

The Court made the following:

                  IA Nos.2 and 3 of 2024
                           in/and
             Criminal Petition No.5507 of 2024


COMMON ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/A.1 to A.7,

under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking

to quash the proceedings in Crime No.54 of 2024 on the file of

Ponnuur Town Police Station.

BVLNC,J

2. Sri Kummara Ratnam Tenneti, learned counsel for the

petitioners and Sri Vutupalli Rajanna, learned counsel

representing for the unofficial respondent No.2 (defacto-

complainant) and Sri.A.Rohit, learned Assistant Public

Prosecutor representing the State are present.

3. Today, when the matter is taken up, petitioners

herein/Accused Nos.1 to 7 and 2nd respondent herein are

present before this Court. They produced their respective aadhar

cards in proof of their identity. Learned counsel for the

petitioners and the learned counsel for 2nd respondent have

identified both the parties in the open Court.

4. This Court has questioned 2nd respondent herein/de facto

complainant with regard to compromise, and he categorically

stated to that extent that he has voluntarily entered into

compromise with the petitioners herein/Accused Nos.1 to 7.

This Court is satisfied with the identification of the parties and

voluntariness in arriving at the compromise. In view of the

compromise between the parties, the chances of conviction are

remote and bleak.

BVLNC,J

5. In the light of judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the

case of Gian Singh v. State of Punjab & another1, on quashing

of criminal case, when the parties entered into settlement and

compromise, the Criminal Petition is allowed and therefore, the

case proceedings in Crime No.54 of 2024 on the file of Ponnuru

Town Police Station, against the petitioners herein/ Accused

Nos.1 to 7 are hereby quashed.

6. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 and Criminal Petition

No.5507 of 2024 are allowed.

As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any,

pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

                                  ____________________     _
                                   B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI, J


Dt. 19.08.2024
SAB





    2012 (9) Scale 257

                                                         BVLNC,J






HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI

I.A Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 in/and Criminal Petition No.5502 of 2024

Dt.19-08-2024

SAB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter