Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4129 AP
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2023
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2221 of 2023
ORDER:
The respondents herein had filed O.S.No.626 of 1997
before the Learned I Additional Junior Civil judge, Tanuku
for removal of a sunshade and pial which were earmarked
as AEFG and GFHI respectively, in the plaint plan annexed
to the plaint.
2. This suit was decreed by the Trial Court and
E.P.No.66 of 2018 came to be filed for execution of the
decree of the Trial Court.
3. The decree of the Trial Court reads as follows:
" That the defendants are directed to remove the sunshade and pial extended by him into the lane portion indicated as 'AEFG'; defendants 3 to 5 to remove the construction made by them in 'GFHI' portion by laying sunshade and constructing pial within months from the date of this judgment;"
4. At the stage of execution of the decree, the
petitioner herein moved an application which was numbered
as S.R.No.5807 of 2022 in E.P.No.66 of 2018 in O.S.No.626
of 1997. This application, said to have been filed under
Section 47 of C.P.C., sought an enquiry about the actual
width of lane ABCD as shown in the plaint plan and the exact
extent of sunshade and pial encroached by the petitioner in
the lane portion indicated as AEFG in the plaint plan with the
help of a Mandal Surveyor.
5. This application was returned by the Executing
Court on the ground that such an enquiry would require the
Executing Court to go behind the decree.
6. Aggrieved by the said return of the application on
25.08.2023, the petitioner has approached this court by way
of the present Civil Revision Petition.
7. A perusal of the decree shows that the Trial Court
had directed removal of the sunshade and pial earmarked as
AEFG and GFHI. In such circumstances, the question of
measuring the width of the lane or the extent of
encroachment of the sunshade and pial does not arise. Any
such exercise would clearly mean an exercise going behind
the decree and the same is not permissible.
8. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is
dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any,
shall stand closed.
____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
08.09.2023 MJA
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2221 of 2023
08.09.2023
MJA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!