Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Unknown vs The
2023 Latest Caselaw 4129 AP

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4129 AP
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2023

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Unknown vs The on 8 September, 2023
    HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

     CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2221 of 2023

ORDER:

The respondents herein had filed O.S.No.626 of 1997

before the Learned I Additional Junior Civil judge, Tanuku

for removal of a sunshade and pial which were earmarked

as AEFG and GFHI respectively, in the plaint plan annexed

to the plaint.

2. This suit was decreed by the Trial Court and

E.P.No.66 of 2018 came to be filed for execution of the

decree of the Trial Court.

3. The decree of the Trial Court reads as follows:

" That the defendants are directed to remove the sunshade and pial extended by him into the lane portion indicated as 'AEFG'; defendants 3 to 5 to remove the construction made by them in 'GFHI' portion by laying sunshade and constructing pial within months from the date of this judgment;"

4. At the stage of execution of the decree, the

petitioner herein moved an application which was numbered

as S.R.No.5807 of 2022 in E.P.No.66 of 2018 in O.S.No.626

of 1997. This application, said to have been filed under

Section 47 of C.P.C., sought an enquiry about the actual

width of lane ABCD as shown in the plaint plan and the exact

extent of sunshade and pial encroached by the petitioner in

the lane portion indicated as AEFG in the plaint plan with the

help of a Mandal Surveyor.

5. This application was returned by the Executing

Court on the ground that such an enquiry would require the

Executing Court to go behind the decree.

6. Aggrieved by the said return of the application on

25.08.2023, the petitioner has approached this court by way

of the present Civil Revision Petition.

7. A perusal of the decree shows that the Trial Court

had directed removal of the sunshade and pial earmarked as

AEFG and GFHI. In such circumstances, the question of

measuring the width of the lane or the extent of

encroachment of the sunshade and pial does not arise. Any

such exercise would clearly mean an exercise going behind

the decree and the same is not permissible.

8. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is

dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any,

shall stand closed.

____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J

08.09.2023 MJA

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2221 of 2023

08.09.2023

MJA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter