Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6925 AP
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2022
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
MAIN CASE : S.A.No.395 of 2022
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFIC
No. E
NOTE
13.09.2022
SRS,J
I.A.No.1 of 2022
This Interlocutory Application is filed to condone
the delay of 163 days in representing the Second
Appeal.
For the reasons mentioned in Para No.3 of the
affidavit, the delay of 163 days in representing the the
Second Appeal is condoned.
Accordingly, this petition is ordered.
______
SRS,J
S.A.N .395 of 2022
Cross objectors/plaintiffs filed the present second
appeal against the judgment and decree, dated
20.10.2021 passed in A.S.No.93 of 2020 on the file of the
III Additional District Judge, reversing the judgment and
decree, dated 17.03.2020 passed in O.S.No.576 of 2018
on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge,
Kakinada.
The suit in O.S.No.576 of 2018 was filed by the
plaintiffs for declaring the title of the plaintiffs and grant
a decree for vacant possession of the plaint schedule
property by evicting the defendant from the plaint
schedule property along with the constructions in the
plaint schedule property. plaintiffs alternatively seeking
preliminary decree for partition of the plaint "B" schedule
property into two equal and equitable shares.
The trial Court decreed the suit by declaring that
plaintiffs have absolute right and title over plaint "A"
schedule property and the defendant is directed to vacate
the plaint "A" schedule property and handover the vacant
possession to plaintiffs within three months from the
date of the judgment and alternative relief regarding
partition is dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the
defendant preferred A.S.No.93 of 2020 and the same was
allowed by judgment and decree dated 20.10.2021 and
hence, the suit was dismissed. Therefore, the present
Second Appeal is filed by the plaintiffs.
Heard.
Admit.
The following substantial questions of law arise for
consideration.
1) Whether the judgment and decree of the Court
below is vitiated in non framing the points for
consideration under Order 41 Rule 31 C.P.C?
2) Whether the plaintiffs proved Ex.A.5-Will as per
Section 68 of Evidence Act and Section 63 of
Indian Succession Act and removed suspicious
circumstances. If so, the finding of the lower
appellate Court is vitiated?
3) Whether the defendant having pleaded that the
property was given to her as per Pasupu-
Kumkuma placed any evidence to prove the same
if not, the judgment of the lower appellate Court is
liable to be set aside?
______
SRS,J
KA
I.A.No.2 of 2022
Issue notice to the respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to take out personal notice to the respondent by registered post with acknowledgment due and file proof of service in the Registry.
List the matter on 11.10.2022.
______ SRS,J KA HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE : C.M.A.No.275 of 2022 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. Date ORDER OFFIC No. E NOTE
05.09.2022 SRS,J I.A.No.1 of 2022 Notice to the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to take out personal notice to the respondents 1 and 2 by registered post with acknowledgment due and file proof of service in the Registry.
List the matter 10.10.2022.
______ SRS,J
ka HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE : C.M.A.No.274 of 2022 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. Date ORDER OFFIC No. E NOTE
05.09.2022 SRS,J C.M.A.No.274 of 2022 Admit Notice.
______ SRS,J
ka
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!