Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2688 AP
Judgement Date : 22 June, 2022
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
MAIN CASE NO: A.S.No.697 of 2013
PROCEEDING SHEET Sl.No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE
22.06.2022 BSB, J
Sri Sydulu Shaik, learned counsel representing the counsel for the appellant/D-1 is present and sought time. No representation for R-1/first plaintiff.
Sri M.Prasad Babu, learned counsel representing Sri V.V.Satish, learned counsel for R-2 and R-3/plaintiffs 2 and 3 is present.
Notice to R-4/D-2 was returned unserved and the notices were sent to R-5 and R-6/D-3 and D-4 were sent but not returned.
The judgment in the suit shows that R-4, R-6/D-2, D-4 remained ex parte in the suit and that the suit against R-5/D-3 was dismissed.
As such, the learned counsel for the appellant sought time to take appropriate steps.
Post on 01.07.2022.
_________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI,J
PNV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!