Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1215 AP
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2021
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION No.5020 OF 2021
ORDER:-
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
"......pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or
direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus
to declaring the action of the respondents 3 & 4 in not considering
the representations submitted by the petitioner dated 19.08.2019 and 09.07.2020 for appointing him as V.R.A on compassionate grounds being the adopted son of deceased Mr. Siddaramaiah in the office of 4th respondent is illegal and arbitrary. Consequently directing the respondents 2 to 4 to consider the representations submitted by the petitioner dated 19.08.2019 and 09.07.2020 by continuing the petitioner as V.R.O on temporary basis for eking out his livelihood till the disposal of the above Writ Petition and to pass....."
2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the
respondents, during hearing, Sri Kalava Suresh Kumar Reddy,
learned counsel for the petitioner, requested this Court, without
touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to respondent
Nos.2 to 4 to dispose of the representations submitted by the
petitioner on 19.8.2019 and 09.07.2020.
3. Learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the
respondents readily agreed to dispose of the representations of the
petitioner, dated 19.8.2019 and 09.07.2020, if any, pending with
the respondent authorities.
4. In view of the submission of the learned Government Pleader
for Services-I, I need not decide the truth or otherwise of the
allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no
such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court
in the case of The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1, wherein
the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy
disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But,
they do no service to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel
for the petitioner himself requested to issue a direction to dispose
of the representations, dated 19.8.2019 and 09.07.2020,
submitted by the petitioner, I find no other alternative except to
issue such direction.
5. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing
respondent Nos.2 to 4 to dispose of the representations submitted
by the petitioner on 19.8.2019 and 09.07.2020, in accordance with
law, within a period of one month from today. There shall be no
order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition
shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Date : 1.3.2021 AMD
2019 (8) SCALE 544
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION No.5020 OF 2021
Date : 1.3.2021
AMD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!