Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2655 AP
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE NO.: S.A.No.34 of 2017
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. Date ORDER OFFICE
No. NOTE
30. 27.07.2021 MVR,J Tr. to I-O
folder
S.A.No.34 of 2017 before
correctio
ns if any.
Heard Sri P.Rajesh Babu, learned counsel for the appellant
Pl.verify.
and Sri T.V.S.Prabhakara Rao, learned counsel for the 1st
respondent.
Upon consideration of the decrees and judgments of the trial Court as well as the 1st appellate Court, since the following substantial questions of law arise for determination in the second appeal, ADMIT.
1. Whether the plaintiff can file a suit for mandatory injunction without seeking for a declaration to remove encroachment by the 1st defendant in a public land and without seeking any direction against the 2nd respondent when the property is vested with it?
2. Whether the plaintiff can file a suit in a private capacity when the dispute is with regard to the encroachment in a public lane?
3. Whether the suit is maintainable without being filed under Section 91 C.P.C?
Issue notice to the respondents to submit arguments in respect of above substantial questions of law(Arulmighu Nellukadai Mariamman Tirukkoil v. Tamilarasi(dead) by Lrs. (AIR 2019 SC 3027) followed).
List the matter during the first week of September, 2021 along with I.A.
______ MVR,J Pab
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!