Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Doni Venkata Srinivas Reddy vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh,
2021 Latest Caselaw 2557 AP

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2557 AP
Judgement Date : 23 July, 2021

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati
Doni Venkata Srinivas Reddy vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 23 July, 2021
Bench: M.Satyanarayana Murthy
     THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

                    WRIT PETITION No.14407 OF 2021

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India, seeking the following relief:

".....to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in proceeding with auction without considering the Petitioner's representation dated 05.07.2021 and 12.07.2021 in respect of house bearing D.No. 2-189 in Revenue Ward No.7 Nidumolu Village, Movva Mandal, Krishna District as illegal, arbitrary Violation of principles of natural justice Violation of Articles 14 and 300A of The Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to consider the Petitioners representation dated 05.07.2021 and 12.07.2021 in respect of house bearing D.No.2189 in Revenue Ward No. 7, Nidumolu Village, Movva Mandal, Krishna District.."

2. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the

respondents, during the course of hearing learned counsel for the

petitioner requested this Court to issue a direction to the respondents

to dispose of the representations dated 05.07.2021 and 12.07.2021

submitted by the petitioners, without touching the merits of the case.

3. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for

respondents readily agreed to dispose of the representations dated

05.07.2021 and 12.07.2021 submitted by the petitioner, if any

pending with the respondent authorities.

4. In view of the submission of Government Pleader for Revenue

appearing for respondents, I need not decide the truth or otherwise of

the allegations made in the petition.

5. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued in view

of the judgment of the Apex Court in The Government of India v.

P.Venkatesh1, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may be

passed for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened

adjudicatory institutions but, they do not serve to the cause of justice.

As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to issue a

direction to dispose of the representations dated 05.07.2021 and

12.07.2021 submitted by the petitioners, I find no other alternative

except to issue such direction.

6. In the result, Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the 4th

respondent to dispose of representations dated 05.07.2021 and

12.07.2021 submitted by the petitioners, in accordance with law,

within four (04) weeks from today. No costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall

also stand closed.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Date: 23.07.2021

KK

2019 (8) SCALE 544

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

WRIT PETITION NO.14407 OF 2021

Date: 23.07.2021

KK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter