Allahabad High Court
Lokesh Kumar Alias Lokendra Singh vs State Of U.P. And Another on 18 June, 2025
Author: Saurabh Srivastava
Bench: Saurabh Srivastava
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:97787
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 4438 of 2025
Applicant :- Lokesh Kumar Alias Lokendra Singh
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Ajaj Ahmad
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.
2. This anticipatory bail application (under section 482 BNSS) has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 151 of 2025, under sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of BNS, Police Station Iglas, District-Aligarh during the pendency of investigation.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. Applicant has not been named in FIR but his name surfaced in confessional statement of co-accused. The allegation made in the FIR are false on the reason that from perusal of alleged sale deed going to be executed between the parties which goes to show that the total amount for sale consideration was agreed Rs.41,40,000/- and thus, there is no question arises to give an amount of Rs.75 lakh to the applicant and other co-accused. Co-accused Hoshiyar Singh has been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.05.2025 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail Application no. 14807 of 2025 and applicant's case is at par with him. Applicant has no criminal history.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail, but could not dispute the said facts.
5. Hence without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of applicant, he is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail as per the Constitution Bench judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi)- 2020 SCC Online SC 98.
6. The future contingencies regarding anticipatory bail being granted to applicant shall also be taken care of as per the aforesaid judgment of the Apex Court.
7. In the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on anticipatory bail. Let the applicant Lokesh Kumar Alias Lokendra Singh involved in the aforesaid crime be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50, 000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned with the following conditions:-
(1) The applicant shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer during investigation and shall report to the Investigating Officer as and when required for the purpose of conducting investigation;
(2) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and
(3) The applicant shall not leave the country during the currency of trial without prior permission from the concerned trial Court.
(4) The applicant shall surrender his passport, if any, to the concerned Court forthwith. His passport will remain in custody of the concerned Court.
(5) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law to ensure presence of the applicant.
(6) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail, the Court concerned may take appropriate action in accordance with law and judgment of Apex Court in the case of Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi)- 2020 SCC Online SC 98.
(7) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against his in accordance with law.
8. In default or misuse of any of the conditions, the Public Prosecutor/ Investigating Officer/ first informant-complainant is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.
9. With the aforesaid observations/ directions, the application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 18.6.2025
Shaswat
