Neetu And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 3528 ALL

Allahabad High Court

Neetu And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. ... on 15 January, 2025

Author: Vivek Chaudhary

Bench: Vivek Chaudhary

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2327-DB
 
Court No. - 10
 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 253 of 2025
 
Petitioner :- Neetu And 2 Others
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Govt. Lko. And 3 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar,Satyawan Pandey
 
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J.
 

Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record.

2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 28.11.2024, bearing F.I.R./Case Crime No.0319/2024, under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 352 B.N.S., Police Station Aliganj, District Lucknow.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences as alleged in F.I.R. have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Code of Criminal Procedure.

4. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) shall be strictly followed in terms of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another.

5. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts.

6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra).

(Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Vivek Chaudhary,J.)

Order Date :- 15.1.2025/Saurabh