Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Surya Prakash Yadav vs The State Of U.P. And 15 Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 15236 ALL

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15236 ALL
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2024

Allahabad High Court

Surya Prakash Yadav vs The State Of U.P. And 15 Others on 2 May, 2024





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:78809
 
Court No. - 49
 

 
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 795 of 2023
 

 
Petitioner :- Surya Prakash Yadav
 
Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 15 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Bahadur Yadav,Sanjeev Yadav
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
 

 
Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
 

1. Objections filed by learned counsel for the petitioner today, is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:

"I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondents authorities to remove the illegal encroachment from the public utility lands pertaining to gata nos. 702 Ka/0.70, Kha/0.06, Ga/0.07, Gha/0.14, Anga/0.23, Cha/0.42, Chha/0.07, Ja/0.12, Jha/0.12, Inya/0.23 1/2, Ta/0.07, Tha/0.07, Da/0.14, Dha/0.52, Ana/1.41, Ta/0.46, Tha/03.0, Da/0.12,Dhha/3.72, Na/0.06, Pa/0.25, Pha/0.14, Ba/0.21, Bhha/0.07, Ma/0.56, Ya/0.06, Ra/1.16, La/0.10, Va/0.12, Sha/0.20, Sha/0.80, Ha/0.16, Tra/1.17, Gya/0.07, Kal/0.52, Khal/1.06, Gal/0.03, Gha1/0.64, Anga1/1.44, Cha 1/0.11, Chha 1/0.20, Ja 1/0.09 Acres situated in Mauja Kuraval Bujurg, Tappa- Bankat, Pargana- Dhuriyapar, Tahsil-Gola, District- Gorakhpur."

4. Learned Standing Counsel has stated that there are no encroachments over the land in question.

5. However, if still the petitioner is aggrieved, he may move an application under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 in view of the judgment passed by this Court in Jahar Singh v. State of U.P. reported in 2017(4) ADJ 619 as well as in Kanhaiya Lal v. State of U.P. and others reported in 2023 (12) ADJ 226.

6. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition.

7. In case, the petitioner moves an application under Section 67 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, before appropriate authority, the same shall be decided after hearing all the concerned parties in accordance with law.

8. With the aforesaid observation, the public interest litigation is disposed of.

Order Date :- 2.5.2024

Nitika Sri.

(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.)

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter