Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rohan Singhal And Another vs Brij Bala Agrawal And 10 Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 3127 ALL

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3127 ALL
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2024

Allahabad High Court

Rohan Singhal And Another vs Brij Bala Agrawal And 10 Others on 5 February, 2024

Author: Ashutosh Srivastava

Bench: Ashutosh Srivastava





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:20865
 
Court No. - 50
 

 
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 474 of 2024
 

 
Petitioner :- Rohan Singhal And Another
 
Respondent :- Brij Bala Agrawal And 10 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Pragya Pandey,Anil Kumar Mehrotra
 

 
Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
 

1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Mehrotra, assisted by Mr Mridul Khare, learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed, notice upon the private respondents is being dispensed with.

3. Present petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, has been filed seeking direction to quash the impugned judgment and order dated 11.07.2023 passed by Additional District Judge/Additional Special Judge (POCSO) Act, Court No. 3, Allahabad, in S.C.C. Suit No. 59 of 2014, whereby and whereunder the application under Order 1 Rule XX of C.P.C. filed by the petitioners for impleading the facts in the suit has been dismissed.

4. At the very outset, Sri Anil Kumar Mehrotra, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a recall application seeking recall of the order dated 11.07.2023 is pending consideration before the learned Additional District Judge/ Additional Special Judge (POCSO) Act, Court No. 3, Allahabad in SCC Suit No. 59 of 2014 and the purpose of filing present petition shall stands served if the appropriate directions are issued to the learned court below, to consider and pass appropriate order of the pending recall application.

5. A specific query has been put to the learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether any objection has been invited by the court concerned with regard to the recall application. The counsel at this stage is not aware.

6. In the opinion of the Court, the petition can be disposed of by requiring the Additional District Judge/ Additional Special Judge (POCSO) Act, Court No. 3, Allahabad, seized with the SCC Suit No. 59 of 2014, to take up the recall application dated 27.07.2023 seeking recall of the order dated 11.07.2023 and pass order thereon expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three weeks. If, no objection is yet to be invited by learned court below, it may do so by granting a week's time and thereafter, to pass order on the recall application. The entire exercise shall be done within a period of four weeks.

7. Till disposal of recall application, it is expected that the learned Additional District Judge/Special Judge POCSO Act, Court No. 3, Allahabad shall not proceed with the proceeding of SCC Suit No. 59 of 2014.

Order Date :- 5.2.2024

v.k.updh.

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter