Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shyoraj And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others
2023 Latest Caselaw 30304 ALL

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 30304 ALL
Judgement Date : 31 October, 2023

Allahabad High Court
Shyoraj And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 31 October, 2023
Bench: Neeraj Tiwari




HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:207554
 
Court No. - 87
 

 
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36786 of 2023
 

 
Applicant :- Shyoraj And 3 Others
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Bhan Kushwaha
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sarvajeet Singh
 

 
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

1. Short counter affidavit filed today is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Sarvajeet Singh, learned counsel for opposite party Nos. 2 to 5.

3. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 16.03.2022, cognizance order dated 29.06.2022 as well as entire proceedings of Case No. 14401 of 2022, arising out of Case Crime No. 0282 of 2021, under Sections- 308, 324, 325, 323 I.P.C., Police Station- Ughaiti, District- Badaun.

4. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that due to some confusion, a scuffle took place between the parties and ultimately, parties entered into compromise on the advice of respectable persons of the society on 17.11.2022, therefore, in light of compromise entered between the parties, criminal proceedings against the applicants may be quashed.

5. Learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 has filed short counter affidavit, in which he has not objected the aforesaid facts and submitted that in case proceedings against the applicants is quashed, he would have no objection.

6. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the applicants and opposite party no. 2 do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them. The matter has been mutually settled between the parties, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further.

7. Thus in view of the well settled principle of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2003(4) SCC 675 (B.S. Joshi) Vs. State of Haryana) as well as the judgement of the Apex Court reported in J.T. 2008(() SC 192 (Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another), as well as judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 (Gian Singh Vs. Stated of Punjab) and reported in (2014) Supreme Today 642 (Narinder Singh & others Vs. State of Punjab and another), the proceedings of the aforesaid case is hereby quashed.

8. The present application is, accordingly allowed.

9. No order as to costs.

Order Date :- 31.10.2023

Sartaj

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter