Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Managing Director U.P. Projects ... vs Smt. Kamlesh Kumari And Another
2023 Latest Caselaw 29244 ALL

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 29244 ALL
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2023

Allahabad High Court
Managing Director U.P. Projects ... vs Smt. Kamlesh Kumari And Another on 18 October, 2023
Bench: Pankaj Bhatia




HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:68681
 
Court No. - 8
 

 
Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION DEFECTIVE No. - 186 of 2023
 
Applicant :- Managing Director U.P. Projects Corporation Ltd. Lko And Another
 
Opposite Party :- Smt. Kamlesh Kumari And Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- I.M. Pandey Ist,Dharm Raj Mishra
 

 
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

Application No.01 of 2023

1. Heard

2. This application seeks condonation of delay in filing application for recall/modification of the judgment/order dated 27.01.2023 passed in Writ-A No.2958 of 2022 (Smt. Kamlesh Kumari Vs. State of U.P. and others).

3. The cause shown is sufficient.

4. The delay, in filing the recall/modification application, is condoned.

On Memo

1. Heard.

2. This application seeks recall/modification of the judgment/order dated 27.01.2023 passed in Writ-A No.2958 of 2022 (Smt. Kamlesh Kumari Vs. State of U.P. and others).

3. By means of the said judgment/order, it was directed that the respondents shall pay an amount of Rs.25,89,602/- to the petitioner, in accordance with law.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that only an amount of Rs.20,38,773/- was adjusted from the dues payable to the petitioner and, the same has been paid to the petitioner, however, on account of an error, the amount was indicated as Rs.25,89,602/-.

5. Considering the averments made in the application, prima facie, this Court had passed order on the impression that an amount of Rs.25,89,602/- has been adjusted from the dues payable to the petitioner, which is a mistake, as in the order dated 15.03.2023, it was recorded that amount of Rs.20,38,773/- was payable to the petitioner.

6. In view of above error, being apparent on record, the judgment/order dated 27.01.2023 is modified by holding that the amount, withheld by the respondents towards the post-retiral-dues, shall be paid. It is further clarified that since an amount of Rs.20,38,773/- has been paid by the respondents to the petitioner, no further amount is required to be paid by the respondents to the petitioner.

7. Application stands disposed of.

.

[Pankaj Bhatia,J.]

Order Date :- 18.10.2023 MVS/-

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter