Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 27333 ALL
Judgement Date : 5 October, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:192284 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32879 of 2023 Petitioner :- Noor Ali Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Learned Standing Counsel submits that petitioner being complainant has no locus to file such petition. Even otherwise, the writ petition has been filed with the single prayer to decide the representation, which is not maintainable.
In support of his submission, he has relied upon the Full Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Vivekanand Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another 2010(10)ADJ 1 (FB). He has also relied upon the judgement of Apex Court in case of A.P.S.R.T.C. & Ors. vs. G. Srinivas Reddy & Ors. reported in A.I.R. 2006 SC 1465, wherein it has been held that a writ with the prayer to decide the representation is not maintainable if there is no statutory provision for filing the representation. Reference may also be made to the judgement of this Court in the case of Daya Shankar Pande vs. State of U.P. and others, reported in 2001(1) AWC 671.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable.
Order Date :- 5.10.2023
Rahul.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!