Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kishan Yadav @ Akhilesh Yadav And ... vs State Of U.P. And Another
2023 Latest Caselaw 15673 ALL

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 15673 ALL
Judgement Date : 18 May, 2023

Allahabad High Court
Kishan Yadav @ Akhilesh Yadav And ... vs State Of U.P. And Another on 18 May, 2023
Bench: Siddharth



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:108360
 
Court No. - 80
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3967 of 2023
 

 
Appellant :- Kishan Yadav @ Akhilesh Yadav And Another
 
Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another
 
Counsel for Appellant :- Rama Pati Tripathi
 
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A for the State.

2. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the appellants,Kishan Yadav @ Akhilesh Yadav and Raju Yadav @ Raj Kumar Yadav, with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No. 202 of 2018, under Sections- 323, 504, 506, 325, 354(A) IPC and Section 3(1)(dha) of SC/ST Act, Police Station- Chaubeypur, District- Varanasi.

3. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.

4. This appeal has been preferred after rejection of anticipatory bail application of appellant.

5. There is allegation against the appellants and three co-accused of committing the offence of beating, threatening, sexual harassment and causing grievous hurt to two persons belonging to schedule caste including one woman who was subjected to offence of sexual harassment.

6. Counsel for the appellant submits that injury suffered by both the injureds were found to be simple in nature by the doctor. He has submitted that the appellants are students and have been falsely implicated in this case. They have no criminal history to their credits. They have no criminal history to their credits. The appellants have definite apprehension that they may be arrested by the police any time.

7. Learned A.G.A has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants. He has submitted that in view of the seriousness of the allegations made against the appellants, they are not entitled to grant of anticipatory bail. The apprehension of the appellants are not founded on any material on record. Only on the basis of imaginary fear anticipatory bail cannot be granted.

8. After considering the rival submissions this court finds that there is a case registered/about to be registered against the appellants. It cannot be definitely said when the police may apprehend him. After the lodging of FIR the arrest can be made by the police at will. There is no definite period fixed for the police to arrest an accused against whom an FIR has been lodged. The courts have repeatedly held that arrest should be the last option for the police and it should be restricted to those exceptional cases where arresting the accused is imperative or his custodial interrogation is required. Irrational and indiscriminate arrests are gross violation of human rights. In the case of Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1994 SC 1349 the Apex Court has referred to the third report of National Police Commission wherein it is mentioned that arrests by the police in India is one of the chief source of corruption in the police. The report suggested that, by and large, nearly 60 percent of the arrests were either unnecessary or unjustified and that such unjustified police action accounted for 43.2 percent of expenditure of the jails. Personal liberty is a very precious fundamental rights and it should be curtailed only when it becomes imperative. According to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the peculiar case the arrest of an accused should be made.

9. Hence without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of appellants, they are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail as per the Constitution Bench judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi)- 2020 SCC Online SC 98. The future contingencies regarding anticipatory bail being granted to appellants shall also be taken care of as per the aforesaid judgment of the Apex Court.

10. In the event of arrest, the appellants shall be released on anticipatory bail. Let the appellants involved in the aforesaid crime be released on anticipatory bail till the conclusion of trial on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned with the following conditions:-

(i) The appellants shall not leave the country during the pendency of trial without prior permission from the concerned trial Court.

(ii) The appellants shall surrender their passports, if any, to the concerned Court forthwith. Their passports will remain in custody of the concerned Court.

(iii) That the appellants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iv) The appellants shall file an undertaking to the effect that they shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law to ensure presence of the appellants.

(v) In case, the appellants misuse the liberty of bail, the Court concerned may take appropriate action in accordance with law and judgment of Apex Court in the case of Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi)- 2020 SCC Online SC 98.

(vi) The appellants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against them in accordance with law.

11. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer/Govt. Advocate/concerned court is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the appellants.

Order Date :- 18.5.2023

Rohit

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter