Geeta Rani vs State Of U.P.
2023 Latest Caselaw 9456 ALL

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
 
 

?Court No. - 85
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2077 of 2023
 

 
Applicant :- Geeta Rani
 
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Pathak,Harshit Pathak
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant,Geeta Rani, with a prayer to release her on bail in Complaint Case No.4762 of 2018, under Sections 384, 504 IPC pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st, Saharanpur.

By the order dated 1.3.2023, the interim anticipatory bail was granted to the applicant granting time to learned A.G.A. to file counter affidavit.

No counter affidavit has been filed as yet.

For the reasons given in the earlier order dated 1.3.2023, the applicant is already on interim anticipatory bail. She shall continue on anticipatory bail till the conclusion of trial on same personal bonds and sureties as per earlier order with the following conditions:-

1. The applicant shall not leave the country during the pendency of trial without prior permission from the concerned trial Court.

2. The applicant shall surrender her passport, if any, to the concerned Court forthwith. Her passport will remain in custody of the concerned Court.

3. That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

4. The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law to ensure presence of the applicant.

5. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail, the Court concerned may take appropriate action in accordance with law and judgment of Apex Court in the case of Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi)- 2020 SCC Online SC 98.

6. The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of her bail and proceed against her in accordance with law.

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer/Govt. Advocate/concerned court is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

Order Date :- 31.3.2023

Ruchi Agrahari