Allahabad High Court
Krishna Kashyap vs State Of U.P.State Of U.P. And ... on 23 January, 2023
Bench: Siddharth
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 50764 of 2022
Applicant :- Krishna Kashyap
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.State Of U.P. And Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Mall
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
As per office report dated 13.1.2023, notice has been served upon the informant but no one has put in appearance on his behalf.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Krishna Kashyap, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 819 of 2022, under Sections 363,366,376 IPC and section 5/6 POCSO Act Police Station Kasya, District-Kushinagar, during pendency of trial.
There is allegation against the applicant of enticement of minor girl with intent to marry besides offence under section 5/6 POCSO Act.Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that victim eloped with applicant on her own free will and went to Chandigarh.Where she married with applicant and she is pregnant.She has not made any allegation of rape against the applicant in her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C.As per radiological report of the victim is aged about 18-20 years.The applicant is in jail since 15.9.2022 and has no criminal history.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant and submitted that victim is minor and no major.Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Suhani & another vs. State of U.P. & others, 2018 LawSuit (SC) 1364, where the Apex court give credence of medical report of the victim than school certificate.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused; submissions of the learned counsel for the parties noted above; finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant; keeping view the uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; applicant being under-trial having fundamental right to speedy trial; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India; considering the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and recent judgment dated 11.07.2022 of the Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. C.B.I., passed in S.L.P (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021; considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by the under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed
Let the applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
4. That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
5. The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law to ensure presence of the applicant.
6. The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 23.1.2023
Atul kr. sri.
