Allahabad High Court
Anil Kumar Singh vs The State Of U.P.Through The Secy. ... on 17 February, 2023
Bench: Irshad Ali
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
?Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8086 of 2003
Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Singh
Respondent :- The State Of U.P.Through The Secy. Education Civil Sectt.
Counsel for Petitioner :- Pt.S.Chandra,D.N.Tripathi,H.G.S.Parihar
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Irshad Ali,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents-State.
2. While entertaining the writ petition, interim order was granted vide order dated 18.1.2005 which is being quoted below:
"Rejoinder affidavit is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for opposite parties no.1 to 5.
List in the Second week of March, 2005 for hearing.
The petitioner has been working as Assistant Teacher L.T. Grade (Games) in Janta Inter College, Hardoiya, Faizabad since 1.1.2001. He has been discharging duties, functions and responsibilities of the post. The employer employee relations are continuing.
Accordingly, the opposite parties are directed to pay salary to the petitioner with effect from 1.1.2005 and continue to pay the same every month. This arrangement shall continue till a duly selected candidation by the concerned Selection Board joins the post held by the petitioner in the institution."
3. Controversy involved in the present writ petition was engaging attention of the Division Bench of this Court. Thereafter, the matter was referred to the Larger Bench in Writ Petition No.655 of 2014 titled 'Abhishek Tripathi v. State of U.P. though Secy. Secondary Education, Lko. & Ors. which was decided vide order dated 17.12.2015 with the direction that the Committee of Management has no right to make appointment, therefore all appointments were held to be illegal.
4. The matter went up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.8300 of 2016 titled 'Sanjay Singh and others v. State of U.P. and others' wherein by means of a judgment the Hon'ble Supreme Court resolved that by enforcing special right fresh selection proceeding be initiated by giving weightage to the teachers appointed under Section 16-E(11) or on ad hoc basis. In pursuance to the direction issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, special right proceedings were initiated and selections were made by inviting applications from candidates who were parties to the litigation. The result of the same has been declared and selection proceedings have been completed and report in this regard has also been submitted before Hon'ble Supreme Court.
5. In view of the above, this writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction to the respondents that the teachers/ lecturers who are at present the TGTs and lecturers would continue to be so employed till regularly selected candidates appoint and to the extent the financial benefits are given by the State Government to the institutions against appointments made in compliance with Section 11-E(11) of the Act, the same will also be given to provide succour to the TGT/ lecturers.
Order Date :- 17.2.2023
GK Sinha
