Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4269 ALL
Judgement Date : 9 February, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28253 of 2000 Petitioner :- U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. And Another Respondent :- Presiding Officer Labour Court And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhagwati Prasad Singh Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,A.S. Srivastava,Anuradha Sundaram,K.P.Agrawal,Ms.Bushra Maryam,Suman Sirohi Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
List revised. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ petition.
Ms. Bushra Maryam, learned counsel appearing for respondent-workmen is present.
This writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 28.03.2000 passed in Adjudication Case No.103 of 1991.
It is contended by learned counsel for the respondent-workmen that the matter inter se between the parties was decided by Hon'ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.2541 of 2005 on 17.04.2007, and the Apex Court had held that the workmen are entitled for re-instatement and in compliance of the judgment of the Apex Court, the respondent-workmen have been reinstated.
A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioners bringing on record the judgment dated 17.04.2007 passed by Hon'ble Apex Court.
In view of the said fact, the matter has become infructuous and there is no need for interfering in the order impugned dated 28.03.2000 passed in Adjudication Case No.103 of 1991 in proceedings under Section 6 (H-1) of the Industrial Dispute Act.
Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 9.2.2023
SK Goswami
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!