Rahul Singh And Another vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 3746 ALL

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 

?Court No. - 12
 

 
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 265 of 2023
 

 
Applicant :- Rahul Singh and Vivek Singh
 
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Civil Sectt, Lko. And Another
 
Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Prakash Pandey,Dr.Surya Prakash Mishra
 
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A., M.V.S. Chauhan
 

 
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State as also Mr.M.V.S. Chauhan, Advocate for the complainant who has filed vakalatnama today in court which is taken on record. .

The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.0092 of 2022 under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., P.S. Maharua, district Ambedkar Nagar.

Learned counsel for applicants, after arguing for some time, submits that he does not want to press the bail application; rather he may be granted liberty to file regular bail application and the same may be decided in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021.

In view of the above, prayer for anticipatory bail is refused and the application is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the applicants file a regular bail application within 20 days from today, the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021.

Order Date :- 6.2.2023

kkb/