Allahabad High Court
X- Juvenile vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 24 August, 2023
Bench: Subhash Chandra Sharma
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:171983
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5026 of 2022
Revisionist :- X- Juvenile
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Revisionist :- Ravi Shankar Tripathi
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The present criminal revision has been preferred by the revisionist through his father with a prayer to allow this revision and set aside the judgment and order dated 20.10.2022 passed byAdditional Session Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Budaun in Criminal Appeal No. 57 of 2022 as well as order dated 11.08.2022 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Budaun. Further prayed to release the revisionist on bail in Case Crime No. 239 of 2022, under Section 377 IPC and Section 5(Da)6 POCSO Act, Police Station Ujhani, District Budaun.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that in this case the revisionist was aged about 16 years at the time of alleged incident in which sodomy was said to be committed with victim who was of tender age. It is further submitted that he is in child care home since 02.05.2022 i.e. more than one year. It is also submitted that there is no material on record to show that sodomy was committed by the revisionist with the victim and the injuries found on his person does not suggest the commission of sodomy, but seems to be caused on some where else.It is further submitted that there is nothing adverse against the interest of the revisionist in the report submitted by D.P.O.
It is further submitted that the provisions as contained u/s 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act had not been considered by the Juvenile Justice Board even the report submitted by Probation Officer was also not considered. The appellate court has also not considered all these facts but rejected the appeal without applying its judicial mind and considering the law as contained u/s 12 of the aforesaid Act. He is in Child Care Home since 02.05.2022 and his psychology is being affected adversely, therefore, requested to set aside orders passed by the J.J. Board as well as appellate court and allow the criminal revision.
Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 opposed the prayer as aforesaid and submits that the orders passed by the learned J.J. Board as well as learned appellate court cannot be said to be unlawful, therefore, he cannot be said to be entitled for bail and revision, being devoid of merit, is liable to be dismissed.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission made by learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. for the State, the time revisionist remained in Child Care Home, perusal of record, the provisions as contained u/s 12 of Juvenile Justice Act, the report submitted by the Probation Officer, it appears that Juvenile Justice Board as well as the appellate court had not considered the relevant provisions and the material on record in well manner but passed the orders without applying their judicial mind. In this way, there appears ground in this revision and the orders passed by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as learned appellate court are liable to be set aside.
Accordingly, the orders passed by Juvenile Justice Board dated 11.08.2022 and the appellate court dated 20.10.2022 are, hereby, set aside and present criminal revision is hereby, allowed.
It is directed that delinquent/applicant be released on bail on executing person bond by the revisionist (father of the delinquent) and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on following conditions :-
(i) The revisionist/father will furnish an undertaking that upon release on bail the revisionist will not be permitted to go into contact or association with any known criminal or allowed to be exposed to any moral, physical, or psychological danger and further that the father will ensure that the juvenile will not repeat the offence.
(ii) The revisionist/father will further furnish an undertaking to the effect that the juvenile will pursue his study at the appropriate level which he would be encouraged to do besides other constructive activities and not be allowed to waste his time in unproductive and excessive recreational pursuits.
(iii) Juvenile and the revisionist/father will report to the Probation Officer on the first Monday of every calendar month.
(iv) The Probation Officer will keep a strict vigil on the activities of the juvenile and regularly draw up his social investigation report that would be submitted to the Juvenile Justice Board concerned on such a periodical basis as the Juvenile Justice Board may determine.
Order Date :- 24.8.2023
Vikram
