Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 22079 ALL
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:164707 Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27264 of 2023 Petitioner :- Pinky Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Singh Yadav,Aman Patel Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
1. Heard Shri Neeraj Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by judgment and order dated 06.07.2023 passed by this Court in Writ C No. 9773 of 2023 (Sakshi And 77 Others vs State Of U.P. And 32 Others) along with connected writ petitions.
3. Considering the material placed before this Court, I find that the petitioner is entitled for the same benefits, which were conferred upon the petitioners of Writ C No. 9773 of 2023 and other connected matters.
4. The writ petition, is accordingly, disposed of in terms of judgment and order of this Court dated 06.07.2023 passed in Writ C No. 9773 of 2023 (Sakshi And 77 Others vs State Of U.P. And 32 Others) along with connected writ petitions, with a direction that respondents shall accord benefits to the petitioner as accommodated to the petitioners of the said matters.
Order Date :- 16.8.2023
Sazia
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!