Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Raja Bhaiya Patel vs State Of U.P.Through Principal ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 18271 ALL

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 18271 ALL
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2022

Allahabad High Court
Raja Bhaiya Patel vs State Of U.P.Through Principal ... on 22 November, 2022
Bench: Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, Saurabh Srivastava



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 

?Court No. - 2
 

 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6680 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Raja Bhaiya Patel
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Principal Secy. Mines And Minerals
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajon Roy
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.,Manoj Singh
 
AND
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6896 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Ram Milan Nishad
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Throu Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Geology And Mines And Ors.
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Pushpila Bisht
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.,Sandeep Sharma
 
AND
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6898 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar Singh
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Throu Prin.Secy.Deptt. Of Geology And Mines And Ors
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Pushpila Bisht
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.
 
AND
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6900 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Prem Kumar
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Throu Prin. Secy. Geology And Mining Lko.And Ors.
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Srivastava
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.
 
AND
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7066 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Throu Its Secy. Deptt.Of Geology And Mining And Ors
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shishir Chandra,Kumar Ayush
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.
 
AND 
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7067 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Narvadeshwar Singh
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Throu Its Secy. Deptt.Of Geology And Mining And Ors
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shishir Chandra
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G,Sandeep Sharma
 
AND
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7068 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Varamdeen Nishad
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Throu Its Secy. Deptt.Of Geology And Mining And Ors
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shishir Chandra
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.,Karunanidhi Yadav
 
AND
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7069 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Haneef
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Throu Its Secy. Deptt.Of Geology And Mining And Ors
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shishir Chandra,Shakeel Ahmad
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G
 
AND
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7070 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Govind Rao
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Throu Its Secy. Deptt.Of Geology And Mining And Ors
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shishir Chandra
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.
 
AND
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7297 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Pavan Kumar
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Throu Prin. Secy.Geology And Mining Lko.And Ors.
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Srivastava,Mohammd Amir Naqvi
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.
 
AND
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7331 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Pranab Pandey
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Principal Secy. Geology And Mines
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Pushpila Bisht,Mohemmed Amir Naqvi
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.,Mohd Amir Naqvi
 
AND
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7913 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Rukshad Ali
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Secy. Geology And Mining And Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shishir Chandra,Mohammd Amir Naqvi
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.
 
AND
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8034 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Omendra Yadav
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thr.Secy.Deptt.Of Geology And Mining Lko.And Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shishir Chandra
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.,Nafisul Hasan Hashmi
 
AND 
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8077 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Ram Deen
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thr.Prin.Secy.Geology And Mining Deptt.Lko.And Ors.
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Gaurav Mehrotra,Asit Kumar Chaturvedi
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.
 
AND 
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8083 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Sahib Alam
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Throu Its Secy. Deptt.Of Geology And Mining And Ors
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shishir Chandra
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.
 
AND
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8085 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Vivek Kumar
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Throu Its Secy. Deptt. Geology And Mining And Ors.
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Shishir Chandra
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.,Anil Kumar Yadav
 
AND
 
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8243 of 2012
 

 
Petitioner :- Shankar Nishad
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thr.Prin.Secy.Deptt.Geology And Mines Lko.Andothers
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Pushpila Bisht,Shishir Chandra
 
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.
 

 
Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J.

Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

Heard Ms. Maria Fatima holding brief of Shri Gaurav Mehrotra and other counsel representing the petitioner in this bunch of writ petitions. We have also heard the learned standing counsel representing the State Authorities-respondents.

Under challenge in this bunch of writ petitions are two Government Orders, (1) the Government Order dated 31st May, 2012 and (2) the Government Order dated 20.7.2012.

By the first Government Order under challenge herein namely the Government Order dated 31.5.2012 it was provided that in the matter of procuring mining leases the process of 'E' tendering has to be followed. So far as the other Government Order dated 20th July, 2012 is concerned, the said Government Order requires a deposit of earnest money to the tune of 25% of the reserved price as a condition precedent for participation in the process of procurement of mining lease.

The issue raised in this bunch of writ petitions stands decided by a judgement of a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Nar Narain Mishra vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2013 (2) A.D.J 166 (D.B.). By the said judgment the validity of the Government Order dated 31st May, 2012 which provided for the process of 'E' tendering has been upheld whereas the Government Order dated 20th July 2012 which required deposit of 25% of the reserved price as earnest money has been held to be invalid for the reason that Rules do not contain any such provision.

In view of the aforesaid, this bunch of petitions are also disposed of in terms of the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench in the case of Nar Narain Mishra (Supra).

Order Date :- 22.11.2022

RS

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter