Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2243 ALL
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3500 of 2022 Applicant :- Pankaj And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. B.K. Singh, learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant in connection with Case Crime No.124 of 2020, under Sections 452, 308, 323, 324, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Seohara, District Bijnor.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgment of the Apex Court in the case of P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198, this Court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the present application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 6.5.2022
Arshad
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!